Literature DB >> 29898897

Replication Fork Breakage and Restart in Escherichia coli.

Bénédicte Michel1, Anurag K Sinha2, David R F Leach3.   

Abstract

In all organisms, replication impairments are an important source of genome rearrangements, mainly because of the formation of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) ends at inactivated replication forks. Three reactions for the formation of dsDNA ends at replication forks were originally described for Escherichia coli and became seminal models for all organisms: the encounter of replication forks with preexisting single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) interruptions, replication fork reversal, and head-to-tail collisions of successive replication rounds. Here, we first review the experimental evidence that now allows us to know when, where, and how these three different reactions occur in E. coli. Next, we recall our recent studies showing that in wild-type E. coli, spontaneous replication fork breakage occurs in 18% of cells at each generation. We propose that it results from the replication of preexisting nicks or gaps, since it does not involve replication fork reversal or head-to-tail fork collisions. In the recB mutant, deficient for double-strand break (DSB) repair, fork breakage triggers DSBs in the chromosome terminus during cell division, a reaction that is heritable for several generations. Finally, we recapitulate several observations suggesting that restart from intact inactivated replication forks and restart from recombination intermediates require different sets of enzymatic activities. The finding that 18% of cells suffer replication fork breakage suggests that DNA remains intact at most inactivated forks. Similarly, only 18% of cells need the helicase loader for replication restart, which leads us to speculate that the replicative helicase remains on DNA at intact inactivated replication forks and is reactivated by the replication restart proteins.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PriA; RecA; RecBC; RecBCD; RecG; RuvAB; chromosome terminus; double-strand break; recombination; replication fork reversal; replication restart

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29898897      PMCID: PMC6094043          DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00013-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev        ISSN: 1092-2172            Impact factor:   11.056


  141 in total

1.  Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression.

Authors:  P McGlynn; R G Lloyd
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Requirements for replication restart proteins during constitutive stable DNA replication in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Steven J Sandler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Stabilization of a stalled replication fork by concerted actions of two helicases.

Authors:  Taku Tanaka; Hisao Masai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Completion of DNA replication in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Brian M Wendel; Charmain T Courcelle; Justin Courcelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The replication intermediates in Escherichia coli are not the product of DNA processing or uracil excision.

Authors:  Luciana Amado; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Coupling of a replicative polymerase and helicase: a tau-DnaB interaction mediates rapid replication fork movement.

Authors:  S Kim; H G Dallmann; C S McHenry; K J Marians
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  PriA is essential for viability of the Escherichia coli topoisomerase IV parE10(Ts) mutant.

Authors:  Gianfranco Grompone; Vladimir Bidnenko; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  DNA transcription and repressor binding affect deletion formation in Escherichia coli plasmids.

Authors:  D Vilette; M Uzest; S D Ehrlich; B Michel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Replication fork reactivation in a dnaC2 mutant at non-permissive temperature in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Boubekeur Saifi; Jean-Luc Ferat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Mechanisms of bacterial DNA replication restart.

Authors:  Tricia A Windgassen; Sarah R Wessel; Basudeb Bhattacharyya; James L Keck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  32 in total

1.  Function of a strand-separation pin element in the PriA DNA replication restart helicase.

Authors:  Tricia A Windgassen; Maxime Leroux; Steven J Sandler; James L Keck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  RecBCD, SbcCD and ExoI process a substrate created by convergent replisomes to complete DNA replication.

Authors:  Nicklas A Hamilton; Brian M Wendel; Emma A Weber; Charmain T Courcelle; Justin Courcelle
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 3.  A Comprehensive View of Translesion Synthesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Robert P Fuchs
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Mutational Analysis of Residues in PriA and PriC Affecting Their Ability To Interact with SSB in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Anastasiia N Klimova; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Replisome structure suggests mechanism for continuous fork progression and post-replication repair.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Michael M Seidman; W Dean Rupp; Yang Gao
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 6.  Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status.

Authors:  Peter E Burby; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Mechanisms of Theta Plasmid Replication in Enterobacteria and Implications for Adaptation to Its Host.

Authors:  Jay W Kim; Vega Bugata; Gerardo Cortés-Cortés; Giselle Quevedo-Martínez; Manel Camps
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2020-11

Review 8.  BRCA1 Mutations in Cancer: Coordinating Deficiencies in Homologous Recombination with Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  John J Krais; Neil Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Atomic force microscopy-based characterization of the interaction of PriA helicase with stalled DNA replication forks.

Authors:  Yaqing Wang; Zhiqiang Sun; Piero R Bianco; Yuri L Lyubchenko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Single bacterial resolvases first exploit, then constrain intrinsic dynamics of the Holliday junction to direct recombination.

Authors:  Sujay Ray; Nibedita Pal; Nils G Walter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.