Literature DB >> 8610705

Relation of breast cancer with passive and active exposure to tobacco smoke.

A Morabia1, M Bernstein, S Héritier, N Khatchatrian.   

Abstract

Studies on passive smoking have consistently shown a tendency toward an increased risk of breast cancer, while studies an active smoking have failed to demonstrate an association. This apparent contradiction may stem from not separating passive smokers from the unexposed when assessing the effect of active smoking. a population based case-control study was conducted in Geneva, Switzerland, between January 1992 and October 1993 to determine the relation of passive and active smoking to breast cancer when the referent unexposed category consisted of women unexposed to active and passive smoke. The 244 patients with breast cancer (cases) were compared with 1.032 women free of breast cancer (controls). The lifetime history of active and passive smoking was recorded year by year, between the age of 10 and the date of the interview. The adjusted odds of breast cancer for ever active smokers, compared with women unexposed to either passive or active smoke, were 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-4.4) for an average lifetime consumption of 1-9 cigarettes per day, 2.7% (95% CI 1.4-5.4) for 10-19 cigarettes per day, and 4.6 (95% CI 2.2-9.7) for 30 or more cigarettes per day. Among passive smokers, the adjusted odds ratio was 3.2 (95% CI 1.6-6.3) for being exposed for the equivalent of 2 hours per day for 25 years. The odds ratios were adjusted for known or postulated risk factors of breast cancer, including alcohol and saturated fat intake. There was no evidence of strong selection, detection, or recall biases. Active and passive exposure to tobacco smoke may increase the risk of breast cancer. Additional studies are needed to decide whether the association is causal. Further elucidation of this relation would benefit not only the prevention of breast cancer but also the the prevention of other smoking-related diseases in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8610705     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  32 in total

1.  Is there an association between passive smoking and breast cancer?

Authors:  S A Khuder; V J Simon
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Kate M Brett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Exposure to multiple sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Patrick T Bradshaw; Amy H Herring; Susan L Teitelbaum; Jan Beyea; Steven D Stellman; Susan E Steck; Irina Mordukhovich; Sybil M Eng; Lawrence S Engel; Kathleen Conway; Maureen Hatch; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Evidence secondhand smoke causes breast cancer in 2005 stronger than for lung cancer in 1986.

Authors:  K C Johnson; S A Glantz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Smoking before the first pregnancy and the risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa A DeRoo; Peter Cummings; Beth A Mueller
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Smoking cessation in women. Special considerations.

Authors:  K A Perkins
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Tobacco smoking and breast cancer: a life course approach.

Authors:  Areti Lagiou; Pagona Lagiou
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Cigarette smoking and the incidence of breast cancer.

Authors:  Fei Xue; Walter C Willett; Bernard A Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-24

9.  Passive smoking and risk of breast cancer in the California teachers study.

Authors:  Peggy Reynolds; Debbie Goldberg; Susan Hurley; David O Nelson; Joan Largent; Katherine D Henderson; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 3. The Two-Stage Design for Confounding Bias Reduction-Having Your Cake and Eating It Two.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Claudia L Rivera-Rodriguez; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.