Literature DB >> 18835941

Breast cancer survival among economically disadvantaged women: the influences of delayed diagnosis and treatment on mortality.

Emily Rose Smith1, Swann Arp Adams, Irene Prabhu Das, Matteo Bottai, Jeanette Fulton, James R Hebert.   

Abstract

Breast cancer affects thousands each year in the United States, and disproportionately affects certain subgroups. For example, the incidence of breast cancer in South Carolina is lower in African American compared with European American women by approximately 12% to 15%, but their mortality rate is twice as high as in European American women. The purpose of the study was to assess factors associated with breast cancer mortality between African American and European American women. Participants (n=314) in South Carolina's Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (SCBCCEDP), which provides breast cancer screening and treatment services, during the years 1996-2004 were included in the study. Data, including tumor characteristics, delay intervals, and race, were examined using the chi(2) test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Cox regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between delay intervals and other factors. No racial differences were found in age at diagnosis, tumor characteristics, or delay intervals. Time delay intervals did not explain differences and mortality rates by race. Survival, however, was affected by prognostic factors as well as by a significant interaction between hormone-receptor status and race. Despite the excellent record of the SCBCCEDP in screening and diagnostic or treatment referrals, the racial disparities in breast cancer mortality continue to exist in South Carolina. These findings highlight the need for future research into the etiology of racial differences, and their impact on breast cancer survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18835941      PMCID: PMC2959167          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  56 in total

1.  Increasing physicians' awareness of the impact of statistics on research outcomes: comparative power of the t-test and and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test in small samples applied research.

Authors:  P D Bridge; S S Sawilowsky
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Connie Y Nakano; Hannah M Linden; Lisa M Reisch; John Z Ayanian; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Characteristics of women refusing follow-up for tests or symptoms suggestive of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheila Weinmann; Stephen H Taplin; Joyce Gilbert; Robert K Beverly; Ann M Geiger; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Judy Mouchawar; M Michele Manos; Jane G Zapka; Emily Westbrook; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Breast cancer in African-American women.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2005-01

6.  Racial disparities in female breast cancer in South Carolina: clinical evidence for a biological basis.

Authors:  Joan E Cunningham; William M Butler
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by racial/ethnic group.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Julia E Heck; Bin Cheng; Suzanne J Smith
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-13

Review 8.  Breast cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; James R Hebert; Susan Bolick-Aldrich; Virginie G Daguise; Catishia M Mosley; Mary V Modayil; Sondra H Berger; Jane Teas; Michael Mitas; Joan E Cunningham; Susan E Steck; James Burch; William M Butler; Marie-Josephe D Horner; Heather M Brandt
Journal:  J S C Med Assoc       Date:  2006-08

9.  Differences in breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African-American and Caucasian patients: a single-institution compilation compared with the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  Gloria J Morris; Sashi Naidu; Allan K Topham; Fran Guiles; Yihuan Xu; Peter McCue; Gordon F Schwartz; Pauline K Park; Anne L Rosenberg; Kristin Brill; Edith P Mitchell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  HER2 therapy: molecular mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance.

Authors:  Rita Nahta; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  33 in total

1.  Unique SNP in CD44 intron 1 and its role in breast cancer development.

Authors:  Juhua Zhou; Prakash S Nagarkatti; Yin Zhong; Kim Creek; Jiajia Zhang; Mitzi Nagarkatti
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality in a multiethnic cohort in the Southeast.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; William M Butler; Jeanette Fulton; Sue P Heiney; Edith M Williams; Alexandria F Delage; Leepao Khang; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The Effects of Hospital Characteristics on Delays in Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Appalachian Communities: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Christopher J Louis; Jonathan R Clark; Marianne M Hillemeier; Fabian Camacho; Nengliang Yao; Roger T Anderson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program.

Authors:  Joan E Cunningham; Christine A Walters; Elizabeth G Hill; Marvella E Ford; Tiffany Barker-Elamin; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Effect on survival of longer intervals between confirmed diagnosis and treatment initiation among low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  John M McLaughlin; Roger T Anderson; Amy K Ferketich; Eric E Seiber; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Breast cancer presentation in an urban health care Safety Net system.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Donna B Jeffe; Jennifer R Tappenden; Courtney E Beers; Bettina F Drake; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

7.  Genetic polymorphisms in RNA binding proteins contribute to breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Rohit Upadhyay; Sandhya Sanduja; Vimala Kaza; Dan A Dixon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Does race affect outcomes in triple negative breast cancer?

Authors:  Jasgit C Sachdev; Saira Ahmed; Muhammad M Mirza; Aamer Farooq; Lori Kronish; Mohammad Jahanzeb
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2010-05-07

9.  Patient and process factors associated with late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in Safety-Net patients: a pilot prospective study.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Donna B Jeffe; Leisha Elmore; Deborah N Ksiazek; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Disparities in Breast Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Quality of Care among African American and European American Women in South Carolina.

Authors:  Marsha E Samson; Nancy G Porter; Deborah M Hurley; Swann A Adams; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.