Literature DB >> 1731843

Ultrasonography, CT, and ERCP in the diagnosis of choledochal stones.

P Pasanen1, K Partanen, P Pikkarainen, E Alhava, A Pirinen, E Janatuinen.   

Abstract

A prospective study of jaundiced (n = 187) and nonjaundiced (n = 33) cholestatic patients was carried out to evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasonography (US), CT, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the detection of choledochal stone disease. Altogether 83 patients had the final diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. In the jaundiced patients, the sensitivity of US, CT, and ERCP was 22.5%, 23.2%, and 80.6%, respectively. In cases of cholestasis without jaundice, the values were 20%, 37.5%, and 66.7%. In patients in whom all 3 imaging studies were done (n = 64), the differences between US and ERCP and between CT and ERCP were statistically significant (p less than 0.0001). In most false-negative ERCP studies (10/15), the clinical course of the disease strongly suggested a passed choledochal stone. On the basis of this study, we recommend prompt ERCP to be performed if choledochal stone disease is suspected on clinical grounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1731843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  12 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance virtual endoscopy of the common bile duct stones.

Authors:  E Neri; D Caramella; P Boraschi; G Braccini; E D Lehmann; G Perri; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.

Authors:  S H Zidi; F Prat; O Le Guen; Y Rondeau; L Rocher; J Fritsch; A D Choury; G Pelletier
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Combination of CT findings can reliably predict radiolucent common bile duct stones: a novel approach using a CT-based nomogram.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Kyung Sook Shin; Jeong Eun Lee; Seo-Youn Choi; Soohyun Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  The added value of tomosynthesis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with radiography for the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Yohsuke Suyama; Yoshitake Yamada; Hideki Yamaguchi; Gou Someya; Seiji Otsuka; Yoshitami Murayama; Hiroshi Shinmoto; Masahiro Jinzaki; Kenji Ogawa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Incidental gallstones.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Wang; Shannon M Foster; Bruce G Wolff
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2009

8.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts the presence or absence of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S N Hochwald; B A Dobryansky M; N M Rofsky; K S Naik; P Shamamian; G Coppa; S G Marcus
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Three-dimensional drip infusion CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: a retrospective analysis of feasibility and adverse reaction to contrast material.

Authors:  A Persson; N Dahlström; O Smedby; T B Brismar
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Moulded calculus of common bile duct mimicking a stenosis.

Authors:  Andrzej Jamry; Marian Brocki; Jacek Smigielski
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.