Literature DB >> 17310302

The burden-of-illness study on osteoporosis in the Slovenian female population.

Biljana Dzajkovska1, Albert I Wertheimer, Ales Mrhar.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This burden-of-illness study on osteoporosis was performed with the main goal to estimate the economic implications of osteoporosis for the Slovenian healthcare system.
METHODS: A variety of sources was used to quantify the utilization of resources in 2003, and the appropriate unit costs were assigned to the identified resources. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study included all direct and indirect costs that arise from treatment of osteoporosis and consequent hip, spine and wrist fractures in total Slovene postmenopausal population in 2003.
RESULTS: We estimated the total burden of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Slovenia for 2003 to be over SIT 7.55 billion (approximately 31.5 million euros); among that, 45% or SIT 3.39 billion (14.2 million euros) belong to drug expenditures for osteoporosis treatment and prevention; 29% or SIT 2.2 billion (9.2 million euros) include indirect costs for osteoporosis morbidity and mortality, and 26% or SIT 1.95 billion (8.1 million euros) belong to direct costs for treatment, hospitalization, and rehabilitation of osteoporotic fractures. Total costs on osteoporotic fractures were however subject to an approximation due to the expert panel-based estimate of proportion of osteoporosis-caused fractures and the limited data on resource utilization for fracture treatment.
CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a costly disease with a significant burden to society and needs to be viewed as an important problem with a complex long-term impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17310302     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-007-9091-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm World Sci        ISSN: 0928-1231


  13 in total

1.  A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Prevention of osteoporosis: cost-effectiveness of different pharmaceutical treatments.

Authors:  A Ankjaer-Jensen; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  On conducting burden-of-osteoporosis studies: a review of the core concepts and practical issues. A study carried out under the auspices of a WHO Collaborating Center.

Authors:  W Ben Sedrine; L Radican; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Direct costs of osteoporosis for New Zealand women.

Authors:  A Lane
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

7.  Cost effectiveness of multi-therapy treatment strategies in the prevention of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  A J Rosner; D T Grima; G W Torrance; C Bradley; J D Adachi; R J Sebaldt; D J Willison
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  The cost of treating osteoporotic fractures in the United Kingdom female population.

Authors:  P Dolan; D J Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The burden of osteoporosis in California, 1998.

Authors:  W Max; P Sinnot; C Kao; H-Y Sung; D P Rice
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  N F Ray; J K Chan; M Thamer; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quality of life, resource use, and costs related to hip fracture in Estonia.

Authors:  M Jürisson; H Pisarev; J Kanis; F Borgström; A Svedbom; R Kallikorm; M Lember; A Uusküla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Trends in the incidence of hip fractures.

Authors:  K Senohradski; L Markovic-Denic; A Lesic; V Bumbasirevic; M Bumbasirevic
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  G Ballane; J A Cauley; M M Luckey; G El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  [Economic concepts for measuring the costs of illness of osteoporosis: an international comparison].

Authors:  K Viktoria Stein; Thomas Dorner; Kitty Lawrence; Michael Kunze; Anita Rieder
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009-05

Review 5.  Economic burden of osteoporosis in the world: A systematic review.

Authors:  Asma Rashki Kemmak; Aziz Rezapour; Reza Jahangiri; Shima Nikjoo; Hiro Farabi; Samira Soleimanpour
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-11-12

6.  A systematic review of the indirect and social costs studies in fragility fractures.

Authors:  M Ruiz-Adame; M Correa
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.