Literature DB >> 23296742

Trends in the incidence of hip fractures.

K Senohradski1, L Markovic-Denic, A Lesic, V Bumbasirevic, M Bumbasirevic.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Hip fracture incidence in the capital city of Serbia was assessed over a period of 10 years (2000-2009). Crude annual incidence rates increased significantly for all ages and both sexes (p = 0.002). Age-adjusted rates also showed a steady increase. The mean rate of annual change for age-adjusted rates was 8.6 % (95 %CI 7.5-9.7) in males, 8.0 % (95 %CI 7.4-8.6) in females, and 8.2 % (95 %CI 7.7-8.7) in the total population.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence rate and trend of hip fractures in the population of Belgrade, the capital of Serbia.
METHODS: Data sources were the official statistics of the Public Health Institute in Belgrade. The patient's age, gender, residence, hospital admission, and diagnosis were registered for each hospital admission. Population estimates were based on census data from 2002 and on published estimates for the intercensus years. The annual incidence (crude) rates and age- and sex-specific incidence rates were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) and age-adjusted incidence rates for persons over the age of 50 years were computed.
RESULTS: A significantly increasing trend of crude incidence rates for all ages was observed in males (p = 0.002), females (p = 0.001), and overall (p = 0.002). The proportion of trochanteric fractures rose significantly with age in women (p < 0.0001), whereas it decreased nonsignificantly in men ≥70 years (p = 0.44). The age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000 in subjects ≥50 years old) showed a steady increase. The mean rate of annual change for age-adjusted rates was 8.6 % (95 %CI 7.5-9.7) in males, 8.0 % (95 %CI 7.4-8.6) in females, and 8.2 % (95 %CI 7.7-8.7) in the total population.
CONCLUSION: Hip fracture incidence continues to increase. In view of the rapid aging of the population, it is necessary to implement a comprehensive preventive policy in our community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23296742     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2244-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

Review 1.  The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century.

Authors:  O Johnell
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-08-18       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  C De Laet; J A Kanis; A Odén; H Johanson; O Johnell; P Delmas; J A Eisman; H Kroger; S Fujiwara; P Garnero; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; P J Meunier; H A P Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Cooper; Z A Cole; C R Holroyd; S C Earl; N C Harvey; E M Dennison; L J Melton; S R Cummings; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The burden-of-illness study on osteoporosis in the Slovenian female population.

Authors:  Biljana Dzajkovska; Albert I Wertheimer; Ales Mrhar
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-02-20

6.  Epidemiology of hip fracture: Worldwide geographic variation.

Authors:  Dinesh K Dhanwal; Elaine M Dennison; Nick C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Changes in population demographics and the future incidence of hip fracture.

Authors:  G Holt; R Smith; K Duncan; J D Hutchison; D Reid
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States.

Authors:  Carmen A Brauer; Marcelo Coca-Perraillon; David M Cutler; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Declining incidence of hip fractures and the extent of use of anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark 1997-2006.

Authors:  B Abrahamsen; P Vestergaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The epidemic of hip fractures: are we on the right track?

Authors:  Klaas A Hartholt; Christian Oudshoorn; Stephanie M Zielinski; Paul T P W Burgers; Martien J M Panneman; Ed F van Beeck; Peter Patka; Tischa J M van der Cammen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prolonged pre-operative hospital stay as a predictive factor for early outcomes and mortality after geriatric hip fracture surgery: a single institution open prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Goran Tulic; Emilija Dubljanin-Raspopovic; Sanja Tomanovic-Vujadinovic; Jelena Sopta; Aleksandar Todorovic; Radovan Manojlovic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  Sinan Zehir; R Zehir; Sultan Zehir; İ Azboy; N Haykir
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Trends in the incidence of hip fracture in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain: 2007-2011 versus 1989-1993.

Authors:  M Sosa; P Saavedra; M J G de Tejada; M Navarro; D Cabrera; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of elderly unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Qi-Chun Song; Sha-Jie Dang; Yan Zhao; Ling Wei; Da-Peng Duan; Wen-Bo Wei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Clinical and functional outcomes of internal fixation with intertrochanteric antegrade nail in older patients with proximal extracapsular femoral fractures.

Authors:  M Galli; V Ciriello; L Bocchino; N M Gangemi; M Peruzzi; E Marzetti
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience.

Authors:  J N Lamb; M Panteli; S G Pneumaticos; P V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Network meta-analysis of surgical treatment for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  He-Hui Wang; Wu-Bin Shu; Guan-Hua Lan; Xiao-Bo Zhang; Zhi-Qiang Jiang; De-Hong Xu; Xue-Xun Bao; A-Bing Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-02

8.  Pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine in elderly patients receiving fascia iliaca compartment block.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Zhang; Chen Lv; Liu-Ying Yang; Shi-Ping Wang; Mei Zhang; Xiao-Wen Guo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  Adherence to Anti-Osteoporotic Treatment and Clinical Implications after Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ramona Dobre; Dan Alexandru Niculescu; Răzvan-Cosmin Petca; Răzvan-Ionuț Popescu; Aida Petca; Cătălina Poiană
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.