Literature DB >> 19484209

[Economic concepts for measuring the costs of illness of osteoporosis: an international comparison].

K Viktoria Stein1, Thomas Dorner, Kitty Lawrence, Michael Kunze, Anita Rieder.   

Abstract

Worldwide osteoporosis is underestimated and despite availability of effective and cost effective treatments, these are often not implemented. Apart from a demographically driven increase in disease cases, failure to implement or tardy implementation of preventive measures as well as poor treatment compliance leads to a deterioration of the health economic outcomes. This in turn causes considerable costs to the health care system and to society, through ineffective intake of medication, diminished quality of life and inability to work as well as substantial costs of rehabilitation of patients. Health economic analyses and methods are increasingly used by decision makers to set priorities and evaluate alternative treatment measures about their cost-effectiveness. In order to be able to capture the costs of illness incurred by osteoporosis, different diseases specific models and methods have been developed, such as the reference model of the IOF, an osteoporosis-specific Markov model or internationally comparable intervention thresholds. Health economists estimate that osteoporosis-related costs will double by 2050 in both Europe and the individual countries. For Europe this means an increase from 40 billion Euro in 2000 to almost 80 billion Euro in 2050. In Austria, an aggregation of the different costs of osteoporosis is not possible, due to a lack of comparability and availability of data. The international ICUROS study and the Austrian Osteoporosis Report 2007 are the first steps towards counteracting this situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19484209     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-009-0674-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  34 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J E Brazier; M Stevenson; N W Calvert; M Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Economic evaluations of interventions for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a structured review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Cynthia P Iglesias; David J Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Incorporating adherence into health economic modelling of osteoporosis.

Authors:  O Ström; F Borgström; J A Kanis; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Paul Lips; Natasja M van Schoor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Borgström; O Johnell; J A Kanis; B Jönsson; C Rehnberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Improving detection and treatment of osteoporosis: redesigning care using the electronic medical record and shared medical appointments.

Authors:  W T Ayoub; E D Newman; M A Blosky; W F Stewart; G C Wood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A coordinator program in post-fracture osteoporosis management improves outcomes and saves costs.

Authors:  Beate Sander; Victoria Elliot-Gibson; Dorcas E Beaton; Earl R Bogoch; Andreas Maetzel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Non-compliance: the Achilles' heel of anti-fracture efficacy.

Authors:  E Seeman; J Compston; J Adachi; M L Brandi; C Cooper; B Dawson-Hughes; B Jönsson; H Pols; J A Cramer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.071

View more
  9 in total

1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral compression fractures of benign or malignant origin: a prospective study of 1188 patients with follow-up of 12 months.

Authors:  Anastasios Mpotsaris; Razmin Abdolvahabi; Bastian Hoffleith; Janpeter Nickel; Ali Harati; Christian Loehr; Chun Hee Gerdes; Svenja Hennigs; Werner Weber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  [Osteoporosis: a challenge for prevention].

Authors:  Anita Rieder; Thomas Dorner; Heinrich Resch; Johann Bröll
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009-05

3.  Expected frequency of biomechanically adverse values of proximal femur geometric variables for fracture risk in the East Slovak female population (epidemiological study).

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-29

4.  Rehabilitation in peripheral non femoral fractures: a review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mangone; Marco Postiglione; Pietro Pasquetti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

5.  Cost-utility of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Spain.

Authors:  Josep Darbà; Lisette Kaskens; Francesc Sorio Vilela; Mickael Lothgren
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-02-09

6.  A path analysis model suggesting the association of information and beliefs with self-efficacy in osteoporosis prevention among middle-aged and older community residents in urban Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Yingchao Cui; Zijun Xu; Yue Shi; Yingyan Wu; Cheng Lv; Qiuming Shen; Tian Shen; Yong Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Use of O-arm with neuronavigation in percutaneous vertebroplasty reduces the surgeon's exposure to intraoperative radiation.

Authors:  Maciej Wojdyn; Olaf Pierzak; Krzysztof Zapałowicz; Maciej Radek
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Percutaneous Stabilization System Osseofix® for Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures - Clinical and Radiological Results after 12 Months.

Authors:  Stephan Albrecht Ender; Elmar Wetterau; Michaela Ender; Jens-Peter Kühn; Harry Rudolf Merk; Ralph Kayser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fracture care using percutaneously applied titanium mesh cages (OsseoFix®) for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures is able to reduce cement-associated complications--results after 12 months.

Authors:  Stephan Albrecht Ender; Anica Eschler; Michaela Ender; Harry Rudolf Merk; Ralph Kayser
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.