CONTEXT: Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training was introduced to bring order and a systematic approach to the treatment of cardiac arrest by professional responders. In spite of the wide dissemination of ACLS training, it has been difficult to demonstrate improved outcome following such training. OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of formal ACLS training in improving survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multi-center, prospective cohort study examined patient outcomes after resuscitation efforts by in-hospital rescue teams with and without ACLS-trained personnel. A total of 156 patients, experiencing 172 in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest events over a 38-month period (January 1998 to March 2001) were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, 30-day survival, and 1-year survival. RESULTS: The immediate success of resuscitation efforts for all patients was 39.7% (62/156). There was a significant increase in ROSC with ACLS-trained personnel (49/113; 43.4%) versus no ALCS-trained personnel (16/59; 27.1%; p=0.04). Likewise, patients treated by ACLS-trained personnel had increased survival to hospital discharge (26/82; 31.7% versus 7/34; 20.6%; p=0.23), significantly better 30-day survival (22/82; 26.8% versus 2/34; 5.9%; p<0.02), and significantly improved 1-year survival (18/82; 21.9% versus 0/34; 0%; p<0.002). CONCLUSION: The presence of at least one ACLS-trained team member at in-hospital resuscitation efforts increases both short and long-term survival following cardiac arrest.
CONTEXT: Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training was introduced to bring order and a systematic approach to the treatment of cardiac arrest by professional responders. In spite of the wide dissemination of ACLS training, it has been difficult to demonstrate improved outcome following such training. OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of formal ACLS training in improving survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multi-center, prospective cohort study examined patient outcomes after resuscitation efforts by in-hospital rescue teams with and without ACLS-trained personnel. A total of 156 patients, experiencing 172 in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest events over a 38-month period (January 1998 to March 2001) were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, 30-day survival, and 1-year survival. RESULTS: The immediate success of resuscitation efforts for all patients was 39.7% (62/156). There was a significant increase in ROSC with ACLS-trained personnel (49/113; 43.4%) versus no ALCS-trained personnel (16/59; 27.1%; p=0.04). Likewise, patients treated by ACLS-trained personnel had increased survival to hospital discharge (26/82; 31.7% versus 7/34; 20.6%; p=0.23), significantly better 30-day survival (22/82; 26.8% versus 2/34; 5.9%; p<0.02), and significantly improved 1-year survival (18/82; 21.9% versus 0/34; 0%; p<0.002). CONCLUSION: The presence of at least one ACLS-trained team member at in-hospital resuscitation efforts increases both short and long-term survival following cardiac arrest.
Authors: Ari Moskowitz; Catherine E Ross; Lars W Andersen; Anne V Grossestreuer; Katherine M Berg; Michael W Donnino Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Nabil Ghorayeb; Ricardo Stein; Daniel Jogaib Daher; Anderson Donelli da Silveira; Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt; Daniel Fernando Pellegrino Dos Santos; Ana Paula Rennó Sierra; Artur Haddad Herdy; Claúdio Gil Soares de Araújo; Cléa Simone Sabino de Souza Colombo; Daniel Arkader Kopiler; Filipe Ferrari Ribeiro de Lacerda; José Kawazoe Lazzoli; Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de Matos; Marcelo Bichels Leitão; Ricardo Contesini Francisco; Rodrigo Otávio Bougleux Alô; Sérgio Timerman; Tales de Carvalho; Thiago Ghorayeb Garcia Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Larry C Field; Matthew D McEvoy; Jeremy C Smalley; Carlee A Clark; Michael B McEvoy; Horst Rieke; Paul J Nietert; Cory M Furse Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Matthew D McEvoy; Larry C Field; Haley E Moore; Jeremy C Smalley; Paul J Nietert; Sheila H Scarbrough Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Samuel O Clarke; Ian M Julie; Aubrey P Yao; Heejung Bang; Joseph D Barton; Sameerah M Alsomali; Matthew V Kiefer; Ali Hasan Al Khulaif; Muna Aljahany; Sandhya Venugopal; Aaron E Bair Journal: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn Date: 2018-03-02
Authors: Amanda K Young; Michael J Maniaci; Leslie V Simon; Philip E Lowman; Ryan T McKenna; Colleen S Thomas; Jordan J Cochuyt; Tyler F Vadeboncoeur Journal: J Intensive Care Soc Date: 2019-05-07
Authors: Catherine E Ross; Ari Moskowitz; Anne V Grossestreuer; Mathias J Holmberg; Lars W Andersen; Tuyen T Yankama; Robert A Berg; Amanda O'Halloran; Monica E Kleinman; Michael W Donnino Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 5.262