Literature DB >> 33147522

Trends over time in drug administration during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States.

Catherine E Ross1, Ari Moskowitz2, Anne V Grossestreuer3, Mathias J Holmberg4, Lars W Andersen5, Tuyen T Yankama6, Robert A Berg7, Amanda O'Halloran7, Monica E Kleinman8, Michael W Donnino2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe trends in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest drug administration and to assess temporal associations of the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guideline changes with drug usage.
METHODS: Pediatric patients <18 years old with in-hospital cardiac arrest recorded in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation database between 2002 and 2018 were included. The annual adjusted odds of receiving each intra-arrest medication was determined. The association between changes in the PALS Guidelines and medication use over time was assessed interrupted time series analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 6107 patients were analyzed. The adjusted odds of receiving lidocaine (0.33; 95% CI, 0.18, 0.61; p < 0.001), atropine (0.19; 95% CI 0.12, 0.30; p < 0.001) and bicarbonate (0.54; 95% CI 0.35, 0.86; p = 0.009) were lower in 2018 compared to 2002. For lidocaine, there were no significant changes in the step (-2.1%; 95% CI, -5.9%, 1.6%; p = 0.27) after the 2010 or 2015 (Step: -1.5%; 95% CI, -8.0%, 5.0; p = 0.65) guideline releases. There were no significant changes in the step for bicarbonate (-2.3%; 95% CI, -7.6%, 3.0%; p = 0.39) after the 2010 updates. For atropine, there was a downward step change after the 2010 guideline release (-5.9%; 95% CI, -10.5%, -1.3%; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Changes to the PALS guidelines for lidocaine and bicarbonate were not temporally associated with acute changes in the use of these medications; however, better alignment with these updates was observed over time. A minor update to the language surrounding atropine in the PALS text was associated with a modest acute change in the observed use of atropine. Future studies exploring other factors that influence prescribers in pediatric IHCA are needed.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Guidelines; Pediatric Advanced Life Support

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33147522      PMCID: PMC7851749          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  15 in total

Review 1.  The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley; Paula Diehr; Scott Emerson; Lu Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 10: pediatric advanced life support. The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults.

Authors:  Vinay M Nadkarni; Gregory Luke Larkin; Mary Ann Peberdy; Scott M Carey; William Kaye; Mary E Mancini; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Truitt; Jerry Potts; Joseph P Ornato; Robert A Berg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Trends Over Time in Drug Administration During Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Ari Moskowitz; Catherine E Ross; Lars W Andersen; Anne V Grossestreuer; Katherine M Berg; Michael W Donnino
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Adherence to advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) guidelines during in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved outcomes.

Authors:  Kimia Honarmand; Chantal Mepham; Craig Ainsworth; Zahira Khalid
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 8.  Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Allan R de Caen; Marc D Berg; Leon Chameides; Cheryl K Gooden; Robert W Hickey; Halden F Scott; Robert M Sutton; Janice A Tijssen; Alexis Topjian; Élise W van der Jagt; Stephen M Schexnayder; Ricardo A Samson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest during nights and weekends.

Authors:  Mary Ann Peberdy; Joseph P Ornato; G Luke Larkin; R Scott Braithwaite; T Michael Kashner; Scott M Carey; Peter A Meaney; Liyi Cen; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amy H Praestgaard; Robert A Berg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The effect of adherence to ACLS protocols on survival of event in the setting of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Matthew D McEvoy; Larry C Field; Haley E Moore; Jeremy C Smalley; Paul J Nietert; Sheila H Scarbrough
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.