Literature DB >> 17307402

The structure-specific nicking of small heteroduplexes by the RAG complex: implications for lymphoid chromosomal translocations.

Sathees C Raghavan1, Jiafeng Gu, Patrick C Swanson, Michael R Lieber.   

Abstract

During V(D)J recombination, the RAG complex binds at recombination signal sequences and creates double-strand breaks. In addition to this sequence-specific recognition of the RSS, the RAG complex has been shown to be a structure-specific nuclease, cleaving 3' overhangs and 3' flaps, and, more recently, 10 nucleotides (nt) bubble (heteroduplex) structures. Here, we assess the smallest size heteroduplex that core and full-length RAGs can cleave. We also test whether bubbles adjacent to a partial RSS are nicked any differently or any more efficiently than bubbles that are surrounded by random sequence. These points are important in considering what types and what size of non-B DNA structure that the RAG complex can nick, and this helps assess the role of the RAG complex in mediating lymphoid chromosomal translocations. We find that the smallest bubble nicked by the RAG complex is 3nt, and proximity to a partial or full RSS sequence does not affect the nicking by RAGs. RAG nicking efficiency increases with the size of the heteroduplex and is only about two-fold less efficient than an RSS when the bubble is 6nt. We consider these findings in the context of RAG nicking at non-B DNA structures in lymphoid chromosomal translocations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307402      PMCID: PMC2692700          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  37 in total

1.  The DDE motif in RAG-1 is contributed in trans to a single active site that catalyzes the nicking and transesterification steps of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  P C Swanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  A C-terminal region of RAG1 contacts the coding DNA during V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  X Mo; T Bailin; M J Sadofsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Intermediates in V(D)J recombination: a stable RAG1/2 complex sequesters cleaved RSS ends.

Authors:  J M Jones; M Gellert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DNA mismatches and GC-rich motifs target transposition by the RAG1/RAG2 transposase.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Tsai; Monalisa Chatterji; David G Schatz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Unraveling V(D)J recombination; insights into gene regulation.

Authors:  David Jung; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Evidence of a critical architectural function for the RAG proteins in end processing, protection, and joining in V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Tsai; Anna H Drejer; David G Schatz
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Full-length RAG-2, and not full-length RAG-1, specifically suppresses RAG-mediated transposition but not hybrid joint formation or disintegration.

Authors:  Patrick C Swanson; Dustin Volkmer; Lei Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  V(D)J recombination: RAG proteins, repair factors, and regulation.

Authors:  Martin Gellert
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 23.643

9.  A non-B-DNA structure at the Bcl-2 major breakpoint region is cleaved by the RAG complex.

Authors:  Sathees C Raghavan; Patrick C Swanson; Xiantuo Wu; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  V(D)J-mediated translocations in lymphoid neoplasms: a functional assessment of genomic instability by cryptic sites.

Authors:  Rodrig Marculescu; Trang Le; Paul Simon; Ulrich Jaeger; Bertrand Nadel
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  14 in total

1.  Cytosines, but not purines, determine recombination activating gene (RAG)-induced breaks on heteroduplex DNA structures: implications for genomic instability.

Authors:  Abani Kanta Naik; Michael R Lieber; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  PREVENTING THE CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS THAT CAUSE CANCER.

Authors:  Robert Hromas; Elizabeth Williamson; Suk-Hee Lee; Jac Nickoloff
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Role of recombination activating genes in the generation of antigen receptor diversity and beyond.

Authors:  Mayilaadumveettil Nishana; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Chromosomal location targets different MYC family gene members for oncogenic translocations.

Authors:  Monica Gostissa; Sheila Ranganath; Julia M Bianco; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Human chromosomal translocations at CpG sites and a theoretical basis for their lineage and stage specificity.

Authors:  Albert G Tsai; Haihui Lu; Sathees C Raghavan; Markus Muschen; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) and chromosomal translocations in humans.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber; Jiafeng Gu; Haihui Lu; Noriko Shimazaki; Albert G Tsai
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2010

7.  Conformational variants of duplex DNA correlated with cytosine-rich chromosomal fragile sites.

Authors:  Albert G Tsai; Aaron E Engelhart; Ma'mon M Hatmal; Sabrina I Houston; Nicholas V Hud; Ian S Haworth; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Gene conversion causing human inherited disease: evidence for involvement of non-B-DNA-forming sequences and recombination-promoting motifs in DNA breakage and repair.

Authors:  Nadia Chuzhanova; Jian-Min Chen; Albino Bacolla; George P Patrinos; Claude Férec; Robert D Wells; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Quantitative analyses of RAG-RSS interactions and conformations revealed by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Pavlicek; Yuri L Lyubchenko; Yung Chang
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Leaky severe combined immunodeficiency and aberrant DNA rearrangements due to a hypomorphic RAG1 mutation.

Authors:  William Giblin; Monalisa Chatterji; Gerwin Westfield; Tehmina Masud; Brian Theisen; Hwei-Ling Cheng; Jeffrey DeVido; Frederick W Alt; David O Ferguson; David G Schatz; JoAnn Sekiguchi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.