Literature DB >> 17307001

Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

J Mark Engel1, Claire Hichie-Schmidt, Alexander Khammar, Barbara M Ostfeld, Amy Vyas, Benjamin H Ticho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of persistent nasolacrimal duct (nasolacrimal duct obstruction) obstruction traditionally has consisted of simple probing. The most common complication with this approach has been recurrent obstruction, requiring another probing, often with the use of bicanalicular silastic intubation. Monocanalicular silastic tubing offers the possibility of increased success rates over simple probing while theoretically minimizing the insertion and removal difficulaties posed by bicanalicular techniques. We report, to our knowledge, the largest series to date of patients undergoing monocanalicular silastic intubation, as well as the first report evaluating this technique as the primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction obstruction.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 635 children treated by 3 pediatric ophthalmologists via probing with monocanalicular silastic intubation as the initial procedure for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction obstruction. Success was defined as good clearance of fluorescein dye and/or the absence of symptomatic tearing. Failure was defined as recurrent symptomatic tearing or inadequate clearance of fluorescein dye, leading to the performance of a second tear duct operation.
RESULTS: We identified 635 children who underwent probing with monocanalicular intubation as the primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction obstruction (mean age at time of probing 18 months). The overall success rate for the 803 eyes undergoing surgery was 96%. The success rate for treatment performed in infants younger than 24 months of age (684 eyes) was 97%, declining to 90% when surgery was performed in infants older than 24 months of age (119 eyes; p < 0.001). These success rates compare favorably to previous reports of primary probing without silastic intubation, especially in children older than 12 months at the time of the probing. The only complication in the current study was conjunctival-corneal abrasion, occurring in 2% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Probing with monocanalicular silastic intubation as the initial surgical procedure for patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction obstruction is associated with a very high success rate and low complication rate, especially when performed by the age of 24 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307001     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  11 in total

1.  A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Dima Andalib; Hossein Mansoori
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Najmeh Zavarzadeh; Alireza Mahmoudi; Mohammad Karim Johari; Seyedeh Simindokht Hosseini; Yalda Abrishami; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  [Minimally invasive diagnostics and therapy of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction].

Authors:  J Heichel; H-G Struck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; B Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; C Scott Atkinson; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Alexander Khammar; David Morrison; Graham E Quinn; David I Silbert; Benjamin H Ticho; David K Wallace; David R Weakley
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Balloon catheter dilation and nasolacrimal duct intubation for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed probing.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Darren L Hoover; Christine L Morse; Susan Schloff; David I Silbert; D Robbins Tien
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05

6.  Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Pavel Komínek; Stanislav Cervenka; Tomáš Pniak; Karol Zeleník; Hana Tomášková; Petr Matoušek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Clinical profile of the patients with pediatric epiphora in a tertiary eye care center.

Authors:  Rebika Dhiman; Bhavna Chawla; Mahesh Chandra; Mandeep S Bajaj; Neelam Pushker
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction.

Authors:  Emad Abdelaal Elsawaby; Rania Assem El Essawy; Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky; Yomna Magdy Ismail
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07

Review 9.  Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (CNLDO): A Review.

Authors:  Aldo Vagge; Lorenzo Ferro Desideri; Paolo Nucci; Massimiliano Serafino; Giuseppe Giannaccare; Andrea Lembo; Carlo Enrico Traverso
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2018-10-22

Review 10.  The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelyn Li Min Tai; Yee Cheng Kueh; Baharudin Abdullah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.