Literature DB >> 18595756

Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Michael X Repka, B Michele Melia, Roy W Beck, C Scott Atkinson, Danielle L Chandler, Jonathan M Holmes, Alexander Khammar, David Morrison, Graham E Quinn, David I Silbert, Benjamin H Ticho, David K Wallace, David R Weakley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of nasolacrimal duct intubation as the primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) in children younger than 4 years of age.
METHODS: A total of 182 eyes of 139 children receiving intubation with planned tube retention for 2 to 5 months were enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized observational multicenter study (19 sites). Children were ages 6 months to <45 months at the time of surgery, with no previous nasolacrimal surgical procedures and had at least one of the following clinical signs of NLDO: epiphora, mucous discharge, and/or increased tear lake.
RESULTS: Treatment success was defined as absence of epiphora, mucous discharge, and increased tear lake at the outcome visit, 1 month after tube removal. The surgical outcome was assessed in 150 eyes (82% of cohort). The proportion of eyes treated successfully was 91% (95% CI: 86%-95%). The outcome dye disappearance test was normal in 125 (86%) eyes, indeterminate in 13 (9%), and abnormal in 7 (5%) of the 145 eyes tested. Monocanalicular tubes were used in 74% of cases. The tube was removed before the planned minimum retention time of 2 months in 61 eyes (41%). For 23 eyes, the early removal was attributed to inadvertent displacement by the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: In children 6 months to <45 months of age, nasolacrimal duct intubation in a nonrandomized and noncomparative trial was a successful primary treatment of NLDO in about 90% of cases not lost to follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18595756      PMCID: PMC2604121          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  35 in total

1.  Dacryostenosis.

Authors:  H W PRICE
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Ritleng intubation system for treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  M R Pe; J D Langford; J V Linberg; T L Schwartz; N Sondhi
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03

3.  Success of balloon catheter dilatation as a primary or secondary procedure for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Stanley Tao; Dale R Meyer; John W Simon; Jitka Zobal-Ratner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Bülent Yazici; Cengiz Akarsu; Muhsin Salkaya
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Silastic intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a study of 129 eyes.

Authors:  H al-Hussain; A M Nasr
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.746

6.  [Role of nasolacrimal intubation in the treatment of lacrimation caused by congenital lacrimal duct obstruction in infants].

Authors:  V Boyrivent; J M Ruban; M P Ravault
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.818

7.  Silicone intubation of the lacrimal system: pitfalls, problems and complications.

Authors:  L Lauring
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-04

8.  Comparison of monocanalicular stenting and balloon dacryoplasty in secondary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing.

Authors:  Scott M Goldstein; Jeffrey B Goldstein; James A Katowitz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.746

9.  Timing of Silastic tubing removal after intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  M G Welsh; J A Katowitz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  The fluorescein disappearance test (FDT): an evaluation of its use in infants.

Authors:  C J MacEwen; J D Young
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Increased prevalence of congenital dacryostenosis following cesarean section].

Authors:  Claudia Kuhli-Hattenbach; M Lüchtenberg; C Hofmann; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Dima Andalib; Hossein Mansoori
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  A comparison of treatment approaches for bilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Katherine A Lee; Danielle L Chandler; Michael X Repka; Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; C Gail Summers; Kevin D Frick; Nicole C Foster; Raymond T Kraker; Scott Atkinson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Nasal endoscopy-guided primary nasolacrimal duct intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 4 years.

Authors:  Ceyhun Arici; Bilge Batu Oto
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.029

5.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with balloon catheter dilation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; B Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; Danielle L Chandler; Deborah R Fishman; Todd A Goldblum; Jonathan M Holmes; Bernard D Perla; Graham E Quinn; David I Silbert; David K Wallace
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Balloon catheter dilation and nasolacrimal duct intubation for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed probing.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Darren L Hoover; Christine L Morse; Susan Schloff; David I Silbert; D Robbins Tien
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05

7.  Nasolacrimal duct intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.

Authors:  S Okumuş; V Öner; C Durucu; E Coşkun; Ü Aksoy; E Durucu; L Şahin; I Erbağcı
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Pavel Komínek; Stanislav Cervenka; Tomáš Pniak; Karol Zeleník; Hana Tomášková; Petr Matoušek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children: How is it changing?

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Grover
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction.

Authors:  Emad Abdelaal Elsawaby; Rania Assem El Essawy; Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky; Yomna Magdy Ismail
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.