OBJECTIVE: The major function of the circadian system is the internal cycling of physiological and metabolic events. The present study sought to explore the effect of rotating shift work schedule on leucocyte count and its relationship with risk factors of metabolic syndrome (MS). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: From a population-based design, 1351 men of self-reported European ancestry were included in a cross-sectional study: 877 day workers were compared with 474 rotating shift workers. Medical history, health examination including anthropometric and arterial blood pressure measurements, a questionnaire on health-related behaviours and biochemical determinations was given to all participants. RESULTS: In comparison with day workers, rotating shift workers had elevated (mean +/- SE) body mass index (27.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 26.3 +/- 0.2, P < 0.0154), waist-hip ratio (0.95 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.01, P < 0.00024), diastolic arterial blood pressure (78 +/- 1 vs. 76 +/- 1, P < 0.033), fasting insulin (65.5 +/- 2.9 vs. 55.9 +/- 1.9 pmol L(-1), P < 0.017), Homeostasis Model Assessment index (2.12 +/- 0.11 vs. 1.77 +/- 0.07, P < 0.0027), triglycerides (1.71 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 mmol L(-1), P < 0.002), uric acid (292.7 +/- 2.8 vs. 282 +/- 3.4 micromol L(-1), P < 0.01) and leucocyte count (7030 +/- 84 vs. 6730 +/- 58, P < 0.0094). In multiple regression analysis, leucocyte count was correlated with rotating shift work independently of age, smoking, education and components of MS. CONCLUSION: The odds ratio for MS in rotating shift workers compared with day workers was 1.51 (95% CI 1.01-2.25), independently of age and physical activity. Increased leucocyte count, a biological marker of systemic inflammation, was associated with rotating shift work.
OBJECTIVE: The major function of the circadian system is the internal cycling of physiological and metabolic events. The present study sought to explore the effect of rotating shift work schedule on leucocyte count and its relationship with risk factors of metabolic syndrome (MS). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: From a population-based design, 1351 men of self-reported European ancestry were included in a cross-sectional study: 877 day workers were compared with 474 rotating shift workers. Medical history, health examination including anthropometric and arterial blood pressure measurements, a questionnaire on health-related behaviours and biochemical determinations was given to all participants. RESULTS: In comparison with day workers, rotating shift workers had elevated (mean +/- SE) body mass index (27.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 26.3 +/- 0.2, P < 0.0154), waist-hip ratio (0.95 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.01, P < 0.00024), diastolic arterial blood pressure (78 +/- 1 vs. 76 +/- 1, P < 0.033), fasting insulin (65.5 +/- 2.9 vs. 55.9 +/- 1.9 pmol L(-1), P < 0.017), Homeostasis Model Assessment index (2.12 +/- 0.11 vs. 1.77 +/- 0.07, P < 0.0027), triglycerides (1.71 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 mmol L(-1), P < 0.002), uric acid (292.7 +/- 2.8 vs. 282 +/- 3.4 micromol L(-1), P < 0.01) and leucocyte count (7030 +/- 84 vs. 6730 +/- 58, P < 0.0094). In multiple regression analysis, leucocyte count was correlated with rotating shift work independently of age, smoking, education and components of MS. CONCLUSION: The odds ratio for MS in rotating shift workers compared with day workers was 1.51 (95% CI 1.01-2.25), independently of age and physical activity. Increased leucocyte count, a biological marker of systemic inflammation, was associated with rotating shift work.
Authors: Kenneth P Wright; Amanda L Drake; Danielle J Frey; Monika Fleshner; Christopher A Desouza; Claude Gronfier; Charles A Czeisler Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Michael D Wirth; James Burch; Nitin Shivappa; Susan E Steck; Thomas G Hurley; John E Vena; James R Hébert Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Meghan M Holst; Michael D Wirth; Anna Mnatsakanova; James B Burch; Luenda E Charles; Cathy Tinney-Zara; Desta Fekedulegn; Michael E Andrew; Tara A Hartley; John M Violanti Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.162