Literature DB >> 17301122

Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients.

Sansal Gedik1, Ahmet Akman, Yonca A Akova.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the efficiency of Rarebit perimetry and the Humphrey field analyser (HFA) in detecting the homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients with occipital lobe infarcts.
METHODS: 40 patients who suffered from visual complaints caused by acute occipital lobe infarcts underwent visual field analysis on the same day, in random order-first with either Humphrey perimetry 30-2, SITA standard program (Zeiss Humphrey Systems) or Rarebit perimetry. A visual field was classified into four quadrants for right and left eyes: superior temporal, superior nasal, inferior temporal, and inferior nasal. The entire mean hit rate numbers (MHR) and mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (PSD) values were compared for each quadrant of each eye.
RESULTS: The results of Rarebit MHR and HFA mean deviation values for each quadrant of the right and left eyes were highly correlated in all patients with homonymous hemianopia (Pearson's r correlation coefficients for superior temporal, superior nasal, inferior temporal and inferior nasal quadrants of right and left eyes were 0.827, 0.833, 0.843, 0851 and 0.746, 0821, 0882, 0.824, respectively (p<0.001 for all quadrants)). There was a strong correlation between Rarebit MHR and HFA PSD for each quadrant of both eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: Rarebit perimetry is rapid, reliable, and easily performed in patients with homonymous hemianopia. It can be done using a simple software program and simple hardware and it readily detects severe visual loss in patients with occipital lobe lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17301122      PMCID: PMC1954830          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.112607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  10 in total

1.  Vigabatrin-associated loss of vision: rarebit perimetry illuminates the dose-damage relationship.

Authors:  Lars Frisén
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2004-02

2.  New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing.

Authors:  Lars Frisén
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  New perimetric techniques: a comparison between rarebit and frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Lene Martin; Peter Wanger
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.

Authors:  P Brusini; M L Salvetat; L Parisi; M Zeppieri
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Microdot test of foveal function. A comparison with visual acuity at high and low contrast.

Authors:  L Malmer; L Martin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Rarebit and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in children and young adults.

Authors:  Lene Martin
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2005-12

7.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Homonymous hemianopia in stroke.

Authors:  Xiaojun Zhang; Sachin Kedar; Michael J Lynn; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  A comparison of tangent screen, goldmann, and humphrey perimetry in the detection and localization of occipital lesions.

Authors:  A M Wong; J A Sharpe
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Representation of the visual field in the occipital striate cortex.

Authors:  R McFadzean; D Brosnahan; D Hadley; E Mutlukan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.638

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Testing the visual field of children and adults with Rarebit: The role of task repetition on sensitivity.

Authors:  Iryna Tachyla; Luca Battaglini; Michele Barollo; Simone Cosentino; Giulio Contemori; Luisa Pinello; Ambra Ciavarelli; Clara Casco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Sensitivity and Specificity of New Visual Field Screening Software for Diagnosing Hemianopia.

Authors:  Supharat Jariyakosol; Patcharaporn Jaru-Ampornpan; Anita Manassakorn; Rath Itthipanichpong; Parima Hirunwiwatkul; Visanee Tantisevi; Thanapong Somkijrungroj; Prin Rojanapongpun
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2021-08-29

3.  Increased Visual Sensitivity and Occipital Activity in Patients With Hemianopia Following Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sara Ajina; Kristin Jünemann; Arash Sahraie; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; Tiziana Usai
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-11-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.