Literature DB >> 12128022

New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing.

Lars Frisén1.   

Abstract

Clinical tests have a poor sensitivity to low to moderate degrees of neuro-visual damage, possibly because their test targets involve numerous receptive fields. A new test used briefly exposed microdots of high contrast. Multiple visual field areas were probed repeatedly, with ever-new microdot positions. Normal subjects responded to a median 96.0% of probes. Patients with different visual field defects missed larger numbers of probes within defects and the deeper the defects, the larger the number of misses. Patients with minor chiasmal lesions averaged 1.8 times larger defects in microdot perimetry than in high-pass resolution perimetry, indicating superior sensitivity to minor damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12128022     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00102-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.

Authors:  P Brusini; M L Salvetat; L Parisi; M Zeppieri
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients.

Authors:  Sansal Gedik; Ahmet Akman; Yonca A Akova
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Mechanisms compensating for visual field restriction in adolescents with damage to the retro-geniculate visual system.

Authors:  L Jacobson; F Lennartsson; T Pansell; G Oqvist Seimyr; L Martin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Detection of visual field defects in pre-perimetric glaucoma using fundus-oriented small-target perimetry.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakatani; Shinji Ohkubo; Tomomi Higashide; Aiko Iwase; Kazutaka Kani; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Association of visual function and ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and no or minimal diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Hille W van Dijk; Frank D Verbraak; Marilette Stehouwer; Pauline H B Kok; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka; J Hans DeVries; Reinier O Schlingemann; Michael D Abràmoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Early detection of macular changes in patients with diabetes using Rarebit Fovea Test and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  M Nilsson; G von Wendt; P Wanger; L Martin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Summation of Temporal L-Cone- and M-Cone-Contrast in the Magno- and Parvocellular Retino-Geniculate Systems in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Cord Huchzermeyer; Folkert Horn; Robert Lämmer; Christian Mardin; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Luciana M Alencar; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Self-Testing of Vision in Age-Related Macula Degeneration: A Longitudinal Pilot Study Using a Smartphone-Based Rarebit Test.

Authors:  Christina Winther; Lars Frisén
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; Tiziana Usai
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.