Literature DB >> 24563276

Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing is clinically useful in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Daniela Jodorkovsky1, Jennifer C Price, Brian Kim, Sameer Dhalla, Ellen M Stein, John O Clarke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing (MII-pH) allows for the detection of acid and non-acid reflux, thus, increasing yield over pH testing. Limited data exist on how physicians use test results in practice. AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of MII-pH testing on patient care.
METHODS: We reviewed records of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease who underwent MII-pH testing. Management decisions evaluated included changes in prescribed medications and surgical consultation for anti-reflux surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson Chi square test, and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: MII-pH testing resulted in a medication change in 41% of patients, surgical consultation in 19.7%, and anti-reflux surgery in 11.1%. In patients who were not on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, MII-pH results were most useful in the decision to start a PPI. On PPI therapy, results were more often used to decide whether to increase (32.3%) or switch the PPI (23.5%) in patients with continued acid reflux. Results were most useful to stop the PPI in normal studies (11.1%). More patients with non-acid reflux (14.3%) and normal results (19.7%) were started on a neuromodulator compared to other diagnoses. The MII-pH result was most useful in the decision to start baclofen or bethanecol when the patient was found to have non-acid reflux (25%). Patients with an abnormal MII-pH or abnormal MII alone were more likely to be referred to surgery (OR 19.5, p < 0.001; OR 19.77, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: MII-pH testing impacted medical or surgical management in over half the patients tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563276     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3080-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  14 in total

1.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Amine Hila; Amit Agrawal; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael F Vaezi; Stephen W Hiltz; Edgar Black; Irvin M Modlin; Steve P Johnson; John Allen; Joel V Brill
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The utility of intraluminal impedance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms but normal endoscopy and 24-hour pH testing.

Authors:  Michael M Kline; Mark Ewing; Nicole Simpson; Loren Laine
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 4.  Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; Kristian Linnet; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Impedance-pH reflux patterns can differentiate non-erosive reflux disease from functional heartburn patients.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Patrizia Zentilin; Radu Tutuian; Daniel Pohl; Lorenzo Gemignani; Alberto Malesci; Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  I Mainie; R Tutuian; A Agrawal; D Adams; D O Castell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings.

Authors:  D Sifrim; R Holloway; J Silny; Z Xin; J Tack; A Lerut; J Janssens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Yield of combined impedance-pH monitoring for refractory reflux symptoms in clinical practice.

Authors:  Georgios Karamanolis; Georgios Kotsalidis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Dimitrios Polymeros; Asimina Gaglia; Smaragdi Fessatou; Maria Triantafyllou; Ioannis Papanikolaou; Spiros D Ladas
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  Multichannel intraluminal impedance accurately detects fasting, recumbent reflux events and their clearing.

Authors:  Steven S Shay; Steven Bomeli; Joel Richter
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  24-hour pH monitoring in symptomatic patients without erosive esophagitis who did not respond to antireflux treatment.

Authors:  R Fass; C Mackel; R E Sampliner
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.062

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Karthik Ravi; David A Katzka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Diagnostic yield of ambulatory oesophageal studies on versus off proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daphne Ang; Qishi Zheng; Luming Shi; Jan Tack
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.