Literature DB >> 17295042

Comparison of femoral fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft: a mechanical analysis in porcine knees.

Giuseppe Milano1, Pier Damiano Mulas, Fabio Ziranu, Laura Deriu, Carlo Fabbriciani.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the structural properties of femur-patellar tendon graft complex in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using different femoral fixation devices. Type of study is biomechanical testing. An ACL reconstruction was performed on 40 cadaver porcine knees, using patellar tendon (PT) graft. Specimens were divided into four groups according to the femoral fixation: interference absorbable screw (Group A), metallic setscrew (Group B), absorbable pins (Group C), and a combination of metallic setscrew and pin (Group D). Other ten knees were used as controls. On each sample, a cyclic loading test, then a load-to-failure test were performed. Elongation after 1,000 loading cycles, ultimate failure load, yield load, stiffness, deformation at the yield point, and mode of failure were recorded. Kruskal-Wallis test and Tukey test were used to compare the differences between groups. The lowest mean elongation after 1,000 load cycles was observed for Group B (1.7 +/- 1.4 mm) and D (1.2 +/- 0.3 mm). Ultimate failure load of Group D (1,021.8 +/- 199.4 N) was comparable with that of normal ACL (1,091.2 +/- 193.3 N) and PT graft (1,140.6 +/- 285.7 N). All other groups were lower than the controls. For mean stiffness, all the groups, excepting for Group D (172.8 +/- 40.4 N/mm), were significantly lower than PT control group (216 +/- 78.4 N/mm). Mode of failure was graft pullout for Groups A and B, distal pin breakage for Group C, and midsubstance graft rupture in 80% of the cases for Group D. Only combined compression and suspension fixation did not show significantly different structural properties in comparison with normal ACL and PT graft. Furthermore, it showed no risk of graft pullout or hardware breakdown in comparison with other fixation devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17295042     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0269-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  35 in total

1.  Interference screw fixation of doubled flexor tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - biomechanical evaluation with cyclic elongation.

Authors:  H Nakano; K Yasuda; H Tohyama; M Yamanaka; T Wada; K Kaneda
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Initial fixation strength of bioabsorbable and titanium interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Biomechanical evaluation by single cycle and cyclic loading.

Authors:  P Kousa; T L Järvinen; P Kannus; M Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  A biomechanical evaluation of transcondylar femoral fixation of anterior cruciate ligament grafts.

Authors:  Gianluca Camillieri; Edward G McFarland; Louis E Jasper; Stephen M Belkoff; Tae Kyun Kim; Peter B Rauh; Pier Paolo Mariani
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Hybrid fixation improves structural properties of a free tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Gareth W Hammond; Kevin L Armstrong; Michelle H McGarry; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex. The effects of specimen age and orientation.

Authors:  S L Woo; J M Hollis; D J Adams; R M Lyon; S Takai
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Comparison of failure strength between metallic and absorbable interference screws. Influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, bone mineral density, and interference.

Authors:  F Pena; T Grøntvedt; G A Brown; A K Aune; L Engebretsen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Metal and biodegradable interference screws: comparison of failure strength.

Authors:  L L Johnson; G E vanDyk
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Intraarticular migration of a femoral interference fit screw. A complication of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  D S Sidhu; R R Wroble
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The effect of Kurosaka screw divergence on the holding strength of bone-tendon-bone grafts.

Authors:  K Pierz; M Baltz; J Fulkerson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Fixation strength of interference screw fixation in bovine, young human, and elderly human cadaver knees: influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, and interference.

Authors:  G A Brown; F Peña; T Grøntvedt; D Labadie; L Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  6 in total

1.  The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro.

Authors:  Camilla Halewood; Michael T Hirschmann; Simon Newman; Jaffar Hleihil; Gershon Chaimski; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Failure load of patellar tendon grafts at the femoral side: 10- versus 20-mm-bone blocks.

Authors:  Duncan E Meuffels; Marnix J N Niggebrugge; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  High-load preconditioning of human soft tissue hamstring grafts: An in vitro biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  W Charles Lockwood; Daniel Cole Marchetti; Kimi D Dahl; Jacob D Mikula; Brady T Williams; Matthew M Kheir; Travis Lee Turnbull; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Graft failure is more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  E Laboute; E James-Belin; P L Puig; P Trouve; E Verhaeghe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarvpreet Singh; Shalin Shaunak; Sebastian C K Shaw; John L Anderson; Vipul Mandalia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF TRANSCORTICAL OR TRANSTRABECULAR BONE FIXATION OF PATELLAR TENDON GRAFT WITH BIOABSORBABLE PINS IN ACL RECONSTRUCTION IN SHEEP.

Authors:  Mauro Batista Albano; Paulo César Borges; Mario Massatomo Namba; João Luiz Vieira da Silva; Francisco de Assis Pereira Filho; Edmar Stieven Filho; Jorge Eduardo Fouto Matias
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.