Literature DB >> 1729305

Signal-to-noise and contrast in fast spin echo (FSE) and inversion recovery FSE imaging.

R T Constable1, R C Smith, J C Gore.   

Abstract

Fast spin echo (FSE) imaging has recently experienced a renewed enthusiasm in the clinical setting for its ability to provide high contrast T2-weighted images in short imaging times. This article evaluates the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) properties of the FSE sequence, inversion recovery (IR) FSE sequence, and conventional SE imaging. The results indicate that FSE imaging displays similar contrast properties to SE imaging, but that the SNR and CNR are improved secondary to the longer TRs and longer effective TEs that may be used. The SNR per unit time of the FSE sequence, and hence its efficiency, is at least a factor of 8 better than the SE sequence when 16 echoes are acquired for each excitation. The addition of a slice selective inversion pulse in IR-FSE allows rapid generation of IR images with image contrast similar to that of conventional IR sequences. When used with a multicoil array for abdominal, pelvic, and spine imaging, the IR-FSE sequence produces images that are virtually free of motion artifact from the subcutaneous fat immediately adjacent to the coils. Both FSE and IR-FSE, when compared with SE imaging, provide superior image contrast and SNR in reduced imaging time.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1729305     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199201000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging. Sequence acronyms and other abbreviations in MR imaging].

Authors:  W R Nitz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Implementation of multi-echo-based correlated spectroscopic imaging and pilot findings in human brain and calf muscle.

Authors:  Gaurav Verma; Scott Lipnick; Saadallah Ramadan; Rajakumar Nagarajan; M Albert Thomas
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Fast spin-echo MR imaging of the pediatric brain.

Authors:  V Engelbrecht; J Malms; T Kahn; S Grünewald; U Mödder
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996

4.  Bone marrow lesions: evaluation with fat-suppression turbo spin echo MR imaging at 0.5 T.

Authors:  H Chrysikopoulos; J Pappas; N Papanikolaou; A Papazoglou; A Roussakis; J Andreou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Experimental O-space turbo spin echo imaging.

Authors:  Haifeng Wang; Leo Tam; Emre Kopanoglu; Dana C Peters; R Todd Constable; Gigi Galiana
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Enhanced refocusing of fat signals using optimized multipulse echo sequences.

Authors:  Ashley M Stokes; Yesu Feng; Tanya Mitropoulos; Warren S Warren
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Effects of magnetization transfer on T1 contrast in human brain white matter.

Authors:  Peter van Gelderen; Xu Jiang; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Liver MR imaging: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin echo with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion recovery.

Authors:  M T Keogan; C E Spritzer; E K Paulson; S S Paine; L Harris; J L Dahlke; J R MacFall
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

9.  Reducing ghosting due to k-space discontinuities in fast spin echo (FSE) imaging by a new combination of k-space ordering and parallel imaging.

Authors:  David W Carmichael; David L Thomas; Roger J Ordidge
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  High-resolution fast spin echo imaging of the human brain at 4.7 T: implementation and sequence characteristics.

Authors:  David L Thomas; Enrico De Vita; Steven Roberts; Robert Turner; Tarek A Yousry; Roger J Ordidge
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.