Literature DB >> 17292772

Microarray genetic screening: a prenatal roadblock for life?

Evelyne Shuster1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17292772     DOI： 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60239-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Impacts of variants of uncertain significance on parental perceptions of children after prenatal chromosome microarray testing.

Authors:  Preeya Desai; Hannah Haber; Jessica Bulafka; Amita Russell; Rebecca Clifton; Julia Zachary; Seonjoo Lee; Tianshu Feng; Ronald Wapner; Catherine Monk; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The 'thousand-dollar genome': an ethical exploration.

Authors:  Wybo J Dondorp; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Integration of modern genetic knowledge and technology into public health in India.

Authors:  Kanjaksha Ghosh; Ajit Gorakshakar
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05

5.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns.

Authors:  Curtis R Coughlin; Gunter H Scharer; Tamim H Shaikh
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.117

7.  The scope of prenatal diagnosis for women at increased risk for aneuploidies: views and preferences of professionals and potential users.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Anja Krumeich; Julie Boonekamp; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-11-09

Review 8.  The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Sam Riedijk; Karin E M Diderich; Sanne L van der Steen; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Femke A T de Vries; Diane van Opstal; Aad Tibben; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Counseling Challenges with Variants of Uncertain Significance and Incidental Findings in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lauren Westerfield; Sandra Darilek; Ignatia B van den Veyver
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.

Authors:  A Kater-Kuipers; E M Bunnik; I D de Beaufort; R J H Galjaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.