Literature DB >> 8134072

Laparoscopic staging of the patient with incompletely staged early adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

J M Childers1, N M Spirtos, P Brainard, E A Surwit.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with presumed early stage but incompletely surgically staged adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
METHODS: Thirteen patients with incompletely staged adenocarcinoma of the endometrium underwent laparoscopic staging. The women ranged in age from 36-74 years (mean age 64) and weighed 132-201 lb (mean 147.5). The interval between hysterectomy and laparoscopic staging ranged from 14-63 days, for an average of 47. All patients underwent inspection of the entire intraperitoneal cavity, procurement of pelvic washings, and/or pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and two patients had remaining ovaries removed.
RESULTS: Extrauterine disease was found in three patients: One had intraperitoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma, and two had pelvic lymph nodes positive for microscopic carcinoma. The average number of lymph nodes removed was 17.5. There were no intraoperative complications. Estimated blood loss averaged less than 50 mL, and the mean hospital stay was 1.5 days.
CONCLUSION: Our initial experience indicates that this is a safe, effective procedure that offers a short hospital stay. We consider laparoscopic staging an attractive option for some patients with incompletely staged early adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8134072     DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Kidong Kim; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures.

Authors:  H Xu; Y Chen; Y Li; Q Zhang; D Wang; Z Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy--a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy; Giovanni Aletti; William A Cliby; Karl C Podratz; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.

Authors:  Joan L Walker; Marion R Piedmonte; Nick M Spirtos; Scott M Eisenkop; John B Schlaerth; Robert S Mannel; Gregory Spiegel; Richard Barakat; Michael L Pearl; Sudarshan K Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: cohort review of patients with uterine neoplasia.

Authors:  Katherine A O'Hanlan; Gloria Shining Huang; Anne-Caroline Garnier; Suzanne L Dibble; Mirjam L Reuland; Lisbeth Lopez; Rebecca L Pinto
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.