Literature DB >> 17286492

High-frequency dynamic nuclear polarization using mixtures of TEMPO and trityl radicals.

Kan-Nian Hu1, Vikram S Bajaj, Melanie Rosay, Robert G Griffin.   

Abstract

In a previous communication [Hu et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10844 (2004)], an approach was demonstrated that improves the efficiency of the cross-effect polarization mechanism employed in high field dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) experiments. Specifically, it was shown that tethering two TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl) radicals increases the electron-electron dipole coupling from approximately 1 MHz in solutions of monomeric TEMPO to approximately 25 MHz in a tethered biradical. The larger coupling resulted in an increase in the DNP enhancements by a factor of approximately 3-4, from 45-50 to approximately 165. Here, a second approach to improving the efficiency of the polarization process is described that involves approximately satisfying the matching condition |omega(2e)-omega(1e)|=omega(n), where omega(2e) and omega(1e) are two frequencies in the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum and omega(n) is the Larmor frequency of the nuclear spins being polarized. Specifically, in a mixture of TEMPO and trityl [tris (8-carboxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl(-d3)-benzo[1,2d:4,5-d']bis(1,3)dithiol-4-yl) methyl] radicals, the intensity maxima in the EPR spectra of these two species are approximately separated by the (1)H NMR frequency. In this case the frequency difference between the g(yy) value of TEMPO and the narrow pseudo-isotropic g-value of trityl is approximately 224 MHz and the (1)H Larmor frequency is 211 MHz. The optimal magnetic field for DNP using the mixtures was found to coincide with the trityl EPR resonance. At 90 K and 5 T, a mixture of 20 mM TEMPO and 20 mM trityl enhanced the (1)H polarization by a factor of approximately 160, an improvement over the enhancement of approximately 50 with 40 mM TEMPO. The reasons for the improvement are discussed and evidence is presented suggesting that DNP enhancement can be improved further by tethering TEMPO and trityl or two similar radicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17286492     DOI: 10.1063/1.2429658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  48 in total

1.  Dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy of GNNQQNY nanocrystals and amyloid fibrils.

Authors:  Galia T Debelouchina; Marvin J Bayro; Patrick C A van der Wel; Marc A Caporini; Alexander B Barnes; Melanie Rosay; Werner E Maas; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  Dynamic nuclear polarization of deuterated proteins.

Authors:  Ümit Akbey; W Trent Franks; Arne Linden; Sascha Lange; Robert G Griffin; Barth-Jan van Rossum; Hartmut Oschkinat
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 3.  Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields.

Authors:  Thorsten Maly; Galia T Debelouchina; Vikram S Bajaj; Kan-Nian Hu; Chan-Gyu Joo; Melody L Mak-Jurkauskas; Jagadishwar R Sirigiri; Patrick C A van der Wel; Judith Herzfeld; Richard J Temkin; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Practical considerations over spectral quality in solid state NMR spectroscopy of soluble proteins.

Authors:  Marco Fragai; Claudio Luchinat; Giacomo Parigi; Enrico Ravera
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Tuning nuclear depolarization under MAS by electron T1e.

Authors:  Alicia Lund; Asif Equbal; Songi Han
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Topical Developments in High-Field Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.

Authors:  Vladimir K Michaelis; Ta-Chung Ong; Matthew K Kiesewetter; Derik K Frantz; Joseph J Walish; Enrico Ravera; Claudio Luchinat; Timothy M Swager; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  THz Dynamic Nuclear Polarization NMR.

Authors:  Emilio A Nanni; Alexander B Barnes; Robert G Griffin; Richard J Temkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Terahertz Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.274

8.  1H dynamic nuclear polarization based on an endogenous radical.

Authors:  Thorsten Maly; Dongtao Cui; Robert G Griffin; Anne-Frances Miller
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Structural factors controlling the spin-spin exchange coupling: EPR spectroscopic studies of highly asymmetric trityl-nitroxide biradicals.

Authors:  Yangping Liu; Frederick A Villamena; Antal Rockenbauer; Yuguang Song; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Enhanced dynamic nuclear polarization via swept microwave frequency combs.

Authors:  A Ajoy; R Nazaryan; K Liu; X Lv; B Safvati; G Wang; E Druga; J A Reimer; D Suter; C Ramanathan; C A Meriles; A Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.