BACKGROUND: A single axial image measured between the 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5) is most frequently chosen to approximate total abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume, but growing evidence suggests that this measurement site is not ideal. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the single magnetic resonance (MR) image that best approximates the total VAT volume in a biracial sample of healthy subjects. DESIGN: We used contiguous abdominal MR images to measure VAT area and summed them to determine total VAT volume. The sample included 820 healthy men and women (n = 692 whites, 128 blacks) aged 18-88 y. RESULTS: A range of MR images had equally high correlations with total VAT in each race and sex group. The image 6 cm above L4-L5 (L4-L5 + 6) was within the best equivalent range for all race and sex groups. The L4-L5 + 6 image crossed the L3 vertebra in 85% of subjects and crossed the L2-L3 intervertebral space or the L2 vertebra for 15% of subjects. Linear regression models indicated that the L4-L5 + 6 image explained 97% of the variance in total abdominal VAT volume, and additional covariates did not increase the R(2) value significantly. The L4-L5 image explained 83% of the variance in VAT volume, and the covariates accounted for an additional 7% of the variance. Rank-order values for VAT can change if total VAT volume is approximated by a single image area. Whereas 25% of subjects changed rank by >or=10% with the L4-L5 image, only 3% changed rank to that degree with the L4-L5 + 6 image. CONCLUSIONS: A single MR image located approximately at the L3 vertebra can accurately estimate total VAT volume in blacks and whites of both sexes.
BACKGROUND: A single axial image measured between the 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5) is most frequently chosen to approximate total abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume, but growing evidence suggests that this measurement site is not ideal. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the single magnetic resonance (MR) image that best approximates the total VAT volume in a biracial sample of healthy subjects. DESIGN: We used contiguous abdominal MR images to measure VAT area and summed them to determine total VAT volume. The sample included 820 healthy men and women (n = 692 whites, 128 blacks) aged 18-88 y. RESULTS: A range of MR images had equally high correlations with total VAT in each race and sex group. The image 6 cm above L4-L5 (L4-L5 + 6) was within the best equivalent range for all race and sex groups. The L4-L5 + 6 image crossed the L3 vertebra in 85% of subjects and crossed the L2-L3 intervertebral space or the L2 vertebra for 15% of subjects. Linear regression models indicated that the L4-L5 + 6 image explained 97% of the variance in total abdominal VAT volume, and additional covariates did not increase the R(2) value significantly. The L4-L5 image explained 83% of the variance in VAT volume, and the covariates accounted for an additional 7% of the variance. Rank-order values for VAT can change if total VAT volume is approximated by a single image area. Whereas 25% of subjects changed rank by >or=10% with the L4-L5 image, only 3% changed rank to that degree with the L4-L5 + 6 image. CONCLUSIONS: A single MR image located approximately at the L3 vertebra can accurately estimate total VAT volume in blacks and whites of both sexes.
Authors: Hiroyuki Motoshima; Xiangdong Wu; Madhur K Sinha; V Elise Hardy; Ernest L Rosato; Donna J Barbot; Francis E Rosato; Barry J Goldstein Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Haroon L Chughtai; Timothy M Morgan; Michael Rocco; Brandon Stacey; Tina E Brinkley; Jingzhong Ding; Barbara Nicklas; Craig Hamilton; W Gregory Hundley Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Ellen W Demerath; Nikki L Rogers; Derek Reed; Miryoung Lee; Audrey C Choh; Roger M Siervogel; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Bradford Towne; Stefan A Czerwinski Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Luke J Connolly; Suzanne Scott; Carmelina M Morencos; Jonathan Fulford; Andrew M Jones; Karen Knapp; Peter Krustrup; Stephen J Bailey; Joanna L Bowtell Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: X Cheng; Y Zhang; C Wang; W Deng; L Wang; Y Duanmu; K Li; D Yan; L Xu; C Wu; W Shen; W Tian Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Ellen W Demerath; Derek Reed; Nikki Rogers; Shumei S Sun; Miryoung Lee; Audrey C Choh; William Couch; Stefan A Czerwinski; W Cameron Chumlea; Roger M Siervogel; Bradford Towne Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 7.045