Literature DB >> 22395811

Single slice vs. volumetric MR assessment of visceral adipose tissue: reliability and validity among the overweight and obese.

Greg Maislin1, Murtuza M Ahmed, Nalaka Gooneratne, Matt Thorne-Fitzgerald, Christopher Kim, Karen Teff, Erna S Arnardottir, Bryndis Benediktsdottir, Hildur Einarsdottir, Sigurdur Juliusson, Allan I Pack, Thorarinn Gislason, Richard J Schwab.   

Abstract

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with abnormal cardiovascular and metabolic profiles. Total VAT volume of the abdominal compartment by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold-standard measurement for VAT but is costly and time consuming. Prior studies suggest VAT area on a single slice MR image may serve as a surrogate for total VAT volume but it is unknown if this relationship is maintained in overweight and obese men and women. Untreated sleep apnea subjects enrolled into the Icelandic Sleep Apnea Cohort (ISAC) underwent abdominal MRI. VAT area and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) area at the L2-L3 and L4-L5 interspaces and total VAT and SAT volumes were determined by manual examination using image analysis software; 539 men and 129 women with mean ages of 54.1 and 58.8 years and mean BMI of 32.2 kg/m(2) and 33.7 kg/m(2), respectively, were studied. Mean total VAT volume was 40% smaller and mean total SAT was 25% larger among females compared with males. The correlation with VAT volume was significantly larger for L2-L3 VAT area (r = 0.96) compared to L4-L5 VAT area (r = 0.83). The difference in correlation coefficients was statistically significant (nonparametric bootstrap P < 0.001 with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference from 0.11 to 0.15. VAT area at L2-L3 was also significantly better correlated with VAT volume than traditional anthropometric variables. Linear regression analyses demonstrated that L2-L3 area alone was sufficient for predicting total VAT volume and that the nature of the linear association was maintained across all levels of obesity and in both genders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395811      PMCID: PMC3743719          DOI: 10.1038/oby.2012.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  39 in total

Review 1.  Waist circumference, visceral obesity, and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Paul Poirier; Jean-Pierre Després
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

2.  Measurement of visceral fat/subcutaneous fat ratio by 0.3 tesla MRI.

Authors:  Tatsuya Gomi; Yoko Kawawa; Masashi Nagamoto; Hitoshi Terada; Ehiichi Kohda
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2005-12

3.  Body fat distribution, blood pressure, and hypertension. A prospective cohort study of men in the normative aging study.

Authors:  P A Cassano; M R Segal; P S Vokonas; S T Weiss
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Adipose tissue distribution measured by magnetic resonance imaging in obese women.

Authors:  R Ross; K D Shaw; Y Martel; J de Guise; L Avruch
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers.

Authors:  N Abate; D Burns; R M Peshock; A Garg; S M Grundy
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.922

6.  Quantification of adipose tissue by MRI: relationship with anthropometric variables.

Authors:  R Ross; L Léger; D Morris; J de Guise; R Guardo
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1992-02

7.  Sex differences in lean and adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging: anthropometric relationships.

Authors:  R Ross; K D Shaw; J Rissanen; Y Martel; J de Guise; L Avruch
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Mark Punyanitya; ZiMian Wang; Dympna Gallagher; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Jeanine Albu; Steven B Heymsfield; Stanley Heshka
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Magnetic-resonance imaging used for determining fat distribution in obesity and diabetes.

Authors:  D S Gray; K Fujioka; P M Colletti; H Kim; W Devine; T Cuyegkeng; T Pappas
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Sex differences in visceral adipose tissue volume among African Americans.

Authors:  Anne E Sumner; Nicole M Farmer; Marshall K Tulloch-Reid; Nancy G Sebring; Jack A Yanovski; James C Reynolds; Raymond C Boston; Ahalya Premkumar
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative proton MR techniques for measuring fat.

Authors:  H H Hu; H E Kan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Optimization of abdominal fat quantification on CT imaging through use of standardized anatomic space: a novel approach.

Authors:  Yubing Tong; Jayaram K Udupa; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Relationship between soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), body composition and fat distribution in healthy women.

Authors:  Elena Dozio; Silvia Briganti; Alessandra Delnevo; Elena Vianello; Federica Ermetici; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Lelio Morricone; Alexis E Malavazos; Massimiliano M Corsi Romanelli
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Facial phenotyping by quantitative photography reflects craniofacial morphology measured on magnetic resonance imaging in Icelandic sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Richard J Schwab; Greg Maislin; Richard W W Lee; Bryndis Benedikstdsottir; Allan I Pack; Thorarinn Gislason; Sigurdur Juliusson; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Effect of Weight Loss on Upper Airway Anatomy and the Apnea-Hypopnea Index. The Importance of Tongue Fat.

Authors:  Stephen H Wang; Brendan T Keenan; Andrew Wiemken; Yinyin Zang; Bethany Staley; David B Sarwer; Drew A Torigian; Noel Williams; Allan I Pack; Richard J Schwab
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  The optimal anatomic site for a single slice to estimate the total volume of visceral adipose tissue by using the quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in Chinese population.

Authors:  X Cheng; Y Zhang; C Wang; W Deng; L Wang; Y Duanmu; K Li; D Yan; L Xu; C Wu; W Shen; W Tian
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Anthropometric predictors of visceral adiposity in normal-weight and obese adolescents.

Authors:  Dorit Koren; Carole L Marcus; Christopher Kim; Paul R Gallagher; Richard Schwab; Ruth M Bradford; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 8.  Emerging Technologies and their Applications in Lipid Compartment Measurement.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Houchun Harry Hu; Wei Shen; Owen Carmichael
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 9.  Segmentation and quantification of adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Houchun Harry Hu; Jun Chen; Wei Shen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Measurement site influences abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in obese adolescents before and after exercise.

Authors:  R E Brown; J L Kuk; S Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.