Literature DB >> 11943834

Regional intra-subject variability in abdominal adiposity limits usefulness of computed tomography.

Jerry R Greenfield1, Katherine Samaras, Donald J Chisholm, Lesley V Campbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, the most accurate methods of abdominal fat measurement, have been applied using a number of protocols, ranging from single-slice area determination to multiple-slice volume calculation. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of single-slice CT for abdominal fat area measurement by estimating the intra-subject variability in abdominal fat areas and comparing the ranking of subjects across four contiguous abdominal levels. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Nineteen premenopausal women (age, 35.3 +/- 1.4 years; mean +/- SE) were studied. CT was used to measure intra-abdominal fat (IAF) area, percentage of total intra-abdominal area (%IAF), subcutaneous abdominal fat (SAF) area, and IAF/SAF at four adjacent cross-sectional lumbar levels (L2-L4). Intra-subject variability (percentage) was defined as SD/mean x 100. Total body fat was measured by DXA, which was further analyzed for central abdominal fat.
RESULTS: Mean body mass index was 24.9 +/- 1.0 kg/m(2). The average (range) intra-subject variability was 28% (8% to 61%) for IAF, 46% (19% to 124%) for %IAF, 26% (14% to 38%) for SAF area, and 19% (7% to 71%) for IAF/SAF. The pattern of this variability was not uniform between subjects, because their ranking by IAF area was markedly different at each CT level. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated significant intra-subject variability in CT-measured adipose tissue areas across four predetermined sites. This resulted in a difference in the ordering of subjects by IAF at each of the four imaging sites, suggesting that the usefulness of single-slice CT in the assessment of abdominal adiposity in premenopausal women may be limited, particularly when performed for the purpose of making comparisons between subjects based on abdominal fat area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11943834     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2002.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Res        ISSN: 1071-7323


  20 in total

Review 1.  Adipose tissue quantification by imaging methods: a proposed classification.

Authors:  Wei Shen; ZiMian Wang; Mark Punyanita; Jianbo Lei; Ahmet Sinav; John G Kral; Celina Imielinska; Robert Ross; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-01

Review 2.  Abdominal adipose tissue distribution and metabolic risk.

Authors:  Suzy Wong; Ian Janssen; Robert Ross
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis.

Authors:  A Shuster; M Patlas; J H Pinthus; M Mourtzakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Sub-cutaneous Fat Mass measured on multislice computed tomography of pretreatment PET/CT is a prognostic factor of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated by nivolumab.

Authors:  Geoffrey Popinat; Stéphanie Cousse; Lucas Goldfarb; Stéphanie Becker; Isabelle Gardin; Mathieu Salaün; Sébastien Thureau; Pierre Vera; Florian Guisier; Pierre Decazes
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  Correlation of visceral adipose tissue measured by Lunar Prodigy dual X-ray absorptiometry with MRI and CT in older men.

Authors:  A S Cheung; C de Rooy; R Hoermann; E J Gianatti; E J Hamilton; G Roff; J D Zajac; M Grossmann
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Single slice vs. volumetric MR assessment of visceral adipose tissue: reliability and validity among the overweight and obese.

Authors:  Greg Maislin; Murtuza M Ahmed; Nalaka Gooneratne; Matt Thorne-Fitzgerald; Christopher Kim; Karen Teff; Erna S Arnardottir; Bryndis Benediktsdottir; Hildur Einarsdottir; Sigurdur Juliusson; Allan I Pack; Thorarinn Gislason; Richard J Schwab
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Visceral adipose tissue measured by DXA correlates with measurement by CT and is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in children.

Authors:  T A Bosch; D R Dengel; A S Kelly; A R Sinaiko; A Moran; J Steinberger
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Novel relationships of age, visceral adiposity, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein concentrations to growth hormone (GH) releasing-hormone and GH releasing-peptide efficacies in men during experimental hypogonadal clamp.

Authors:  Johannes D Veldhuis; Daniel M Keenan; Joy N Bailey; Adebordurin M Adeniji; John M Miles; Cyril Y Bowers
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Approximation of total visceral adipose tissue with a single magnetic resonance image.

Authors:  Ellen W Demerath; Wei Shen; Miryoung Lee; Audrey C Choh; Stefan A Czerwinski; Roger M Siervogel; Bradford Towne
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Mark Punyanitya; ZiMian Wang; Dympna Gallagher; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Jeanine Albu; Steven B Heymsfield; Stanley Heshka
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.