Literature DB >> 17279422

Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts.

Csaba Moskát1, Márk E Hauber.   

Abstract

Common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) are obligate brood parasites, laying eggs into nests of small songbirds. The cuckoo hatchling evicts all eggs and young from a nest, eliminating hosts' breeding success. Despite the consistently high costs of parasitism by common cuckoos, great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) hosts sometime accept and other times reject parasitic eggs. To explore the cognitive basis of this seemingly maladaptive variation in host responses, we documented differences in egg rejection rates within 1-day periods just before and during the egg-laying cycle across host nests. Hosts rejected cuckoo eggs at 28% of nests during the pre-egg-laying stage, but when cuckoos exchanged the first host egg with the parasite egg, rejections increased to 75%. Even later, when several host eggs remained in a nest after parasitism, rejection rate fell to 37.5%. Experimental parasitism with conspecific eggs on the first and second day of host laying showed a similar directional change in relative rejection rates, dropping from 35 to 0%. Mistakes in egg discrimination (ejection error and ejection cost) were observed mostly in the latter part of the laying cycle, mainly when nests contained 5-6 eggs. These correlational and experimental patterns of egg rejection support a cognitive process of egg discrimination through several shifts in hosts' optimal acceptance thresholds of foreign eggs. The results are also consistent with the evolution of foreign egg rejection in the context of nest-sanitation (i.e. the removal of foreign objects). Our results suggest that common cuckoo hosts may recognize more eggs than they reject. This implies that the experience of the host with one or more of its own eggs in the clutch is a key factor in rejecting parasite eggs by allowing inspection and learning about their own clutch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17279422     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0071-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  27 in total

1.  Egg retrieval versus egg rejection in cuckoo hosts.

Authors:  Canchao Yang; Wei Liang; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Variation in multicomponent recognition cues alters egg rejection decisions: a test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Daniel Hanley; Analía V López; Vanina D Fiorini; Juan C Reboreda; Tomáš Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Alternative mechanisms of increased eggshell hardness of avian brood parasites relative to host species.

Authors:  Branislav Igic; Kim Braganza; Margaret M Hyland; Heather Silyn-Roberts; Phillip Cassey; Tomas Grim; Jarkko Rutila; Csaba Moskát; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection.

Authors:  Francisco Ruiz-Raya; Manuel Soler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  How to learn to recognize conspecific brood parasitic offspring.

Authors:  Daizaburo Shizuka; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Do first-time breeding females imprint on their own eggs?

Authors:  Manuel Soler; Cristina Ruiz-Castellano; Laura G Carra; Juan Ontanilla; David Martín-Galvez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Brood parasites lay eggs matching the appearance of host clutches.

Authors:  Marcel Honza; Michal Šulc; Václav Jelínek; Milica Požgayová; Petr Procházka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Variability in avian eggshell colour: a comparative study of museum eggshells.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; Steven J Portugal; Golo Maurer; John G Ewen; Rebecca L Boulton; Mark E Hauber; Tim M Blackburn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; Marcel Honza; Tomas Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Egg eviction imposes a recoverable cost of virulence in chicks of a brood parasite.

Authors:  Michael G Anderson; Csaba Moskát; Miklós Bán; Tomás Grim; Phillip Cassey; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.