Literature DB >> 24258721

Brood parasites lay eggs matching the appearance of host clutches.

Marcel Honza1, Michal Šulc, Václav Jelínek, Milica Požgayová, Petr Procházka.   

Abstract

Interspecific brood parasitism represents a prime example of the coevolutionary arms race where each party has evolved strategies in response to the other. Here, we investigated whether common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) actively select nests within a host population to match the egg appearance of a particular host clutch. To achieve this goal, we quantified the degree of egg matching using the avian vision modelling approach. Randomization tests revealed that cuckoo eggs in naturally parasitized nests showed lower chromatic contrast to host eggs than those assigned randomly to other nests with egg-laying date similar to naturally parasitized clutches. Moreover, egg matching in terms of chromaticity was better in naturally parasitized nests than it would be in the nests of the nearest active non-parasitized neighbour. However, there was no indication of matching in achromatic spectral characteristics whatsoever. Thus, our results clearly indicate that cuckoos select certain host nests to increase matching of their own eggs with host clutches, but only in chromatic characteristics. Our results suggest that the ability of cuckoos to actively choose host nests based on the eggshell appearance imposes a strong selection pressure on host egg recognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brood parasitism; cuckoo; egg coloration; egg mimicry; great reed warbler

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24258721      PMCID: PMC3843844          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  38 in total

1.  Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds.

Authors:  N S Hart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  M E Hauber; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA.

Authors:  Anders Odeen; Olle Hastad
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision.

Authors:  D Osorio; M Vorobyev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Cryptic gentes revealed in pallid cuckoos Cuculus pallidus using reflectance spectrophotometry.

Authors:  M Starling; R Heinsohn; A Cockburn; N E Langmore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo, as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry.

Authors:  M I Cherry; A T Bennett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.).

Authors:  N S Hart; J C Partridge; I C Cuthill; A T Bennett
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Genetic evidence for female host-specific races of the common cuckoo.

Authors:  H L Gibbs; M D Sorenson; K Marchetti; M D Brooke; N B Davies; H Nakamura
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-09-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds.

Authors:  Michael D Sorenson; Kristina M Sefc; Robert B Payne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus).

Authors:  Nathan S Hart
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Colour, vision and coevolution in avian brood parasitism.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Avian egg and nestling detection in the wild: should we rely on visual models or behavioural experiments?

Authors:  Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Host genotype and age have no effect on rejection of parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Petr Procházka; Hana Konvičková-Patzenhauerová; Milica Požgayová; Alfréd Trnka; Václav Jelínek; Marcel Honza
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-04-10

4.  Naïve hosts of avian brood parasites accept foreign eggs, whereas older hosts fine-tune foreign egg discrimination during laying.

Authors:  Csaba Moskát; Miklós Bán; Márk E Hauber
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Continuous variation rather than specialization in the egg phenotypes of cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) parasitizing two sympatric reed warbler species.

Authors:  Szymon M Drobniak; Andrzej Dyrcz; Joanna Sudyka; Mariusz Cichoń
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Nest destruction elicits indiscriminate con- versus heterospecific brood parasitism in a captive bird.

Authors:  Rachael C Shaw; William E Feeney; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Experimental shifts in intraclutch egg color variation do not affect egg rejection in a host of a non-egg-mimetic avian brood parasite.

Authors:  Rebecca Croston; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How can distinct egg polymorphism be maintained in the rufescent prinia (Prinia rufescens)-plaintive cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) interaction-a modeling approach.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Canchao Yang; Fugo Takasu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Characteristics determining host suitability for a generalist parasite.

Authors:  Bård G Stokke; Irja I Ratikainen; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Karl Schulze-Hagen; David I Leech; Anders Pape Møller; Frode Fossøy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dynamic egg color mimicry.

Authors:  Daniel Hanley; Michal Šulc; Patricia L R Brennan; Mark E Hauber; Tomáš Grim; Marcel Honza
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.