BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to obtain insight into distress in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer. METHODS: Forty-one patient-spouse pairs completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Inclusion criteria included curative treatment for head and neck cancer. Exclusion criteria were visiting the clinic without a spouse, bad news at the routine follow-up examination, diseases causing cognitive dysfunction, and poor understanding of the Dutch language. Next to the HADS, the assessment protocol included age, gender, health status, coping strategy, time since cancer treatment, tumor stage and site, treatment modality, functional and social impairment, and caregiving burden. RESULTS: A clinical level of distress was noted in 20% of the spouses and in 27% of the patients. Distress in spouses was related to the presence of a feeding tube in patients, a passive coping style, less vitality, and a disrupted daily life schedule resulting from caregiving. Distress in patients was related to the presence of a feeding tube, speech and swallowing problems, less social contacts, a passive style of coping, and nonexpression of emotions. CONCLUSION: Distress is often present in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer. Routine screening for psychologic distress is recommended.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to obtain insight into distress in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer. METHODS: Forty-one patient-spouse pairs completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Inclusion criteria included curative treatment for head and neck cancer. Exclusion criteria were visiting the clinic without a spouse, bad news at the routine follow-up examination, diseases causing cognitive dysfunction, and poor understanding of the Dutch language. Next to the HADS, the assessment protocol included age, gender, health status, coping strategy, time since cancer treatment, tumor stage and site, treatment modality, functional and social impairment, and caregiving burden. RESULTS: A clinical level of distress was noted in 20% of the spouses and in 27% of the patients. Distress in spouses was related to the presence of a feeding tube in patients, a passive coping style, less vitality, and a disrupted daily life schedule resulting from caregiving. Distress in patients was related to the presence of a feeding tube, speech and swallowing problems, less social contacts, a passive style of coping, and nonexpression of emotions. CONCLUSION: Distress is often present in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer. Routine screening for psychologic distress is recommended.
Authors: Gabriella Morasso; Silvia Di Leo; Anita Caruso; Andrea Decensi; Monica Beccaro; Laura Berretta; Laura Bongiorno; Maurizio Cosimelli; Stefania Finelli; Gabriella Rondanina; Wissya Santoni; Vittoria Stigliano; Massimo Costantini Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: A Meyer; J Keszte; D Wollbrück; A Dietz; J Oeken; H J Vogel; S Koscielny; K Breitenstein; E F Meister; F Pabst; J Schock; S Bourkas; S Singer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Donna M Posluszny; Angela Liegey Dougall; Jonas T Johnson; Athanassios Argiris; Robert L Ferris; Andrew Baum; Dana H Bovbjerg; Mary Amanda Dew Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Stephanie Ross; Catherine E Mosher; Victor Ronis-Tobin; Sandy Hermele; Jamie S Ostroff Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 3.603