BACKGROUND: Although transient left ventricular (LV) dilation is a well-known marker for extensive coronary artery disease (CAD), few studies have performed quantitative analysis of LV function after stress and at rest to detect extensive CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Poststress and resting gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed in 175 patients with suspected CAD. All of the patients underwent coronary angiography within 3 months of gated SPECT. In the 83 patients with multivessel CAD, the summed difference score was greater (9.2 +/- 7.0 vs 3.3 +/- 4.0, P < .0001), the poststress increase in end-systolic volume (ESV) was larger (7.0 +/- 8.0 mL vs -0.8 +/- 4.7 mL, P < .0001), and the poststress increase in ejection fraction (EF) was less (-4.7% +/- 5.4% vs -0.4% +/- 4.5%, P < .0001) than in the 92 patients with insignificant or single-vessel CAD. In the detection of multivessel CAD, a summed difference score of 9 or greater showed a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 90%, whereas an increase in ESV of 5 mL or greater and a decrease in EF of 5% or greater after exercise had a sensitivity of 66% and 52%, respectively, and specificity of 87% and 83%, respectively. The multivariate discriminant analysis revealed that the combination of poststress increase in ESV, summed difference score, and diabetes mellitus best identified multivessel CAD, with a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 84% (chi(2), 81.7). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of poststress and at-rest LV functional analysis by use of gated SPECT to conventional perfusion analysis helps to better identify patients with multivessel CAD.
BACKGROUND: Although transient left ventricular (LV) dilation is a well-known marker for extensive coronary artery disease (CAD), few studies have performed quantitative analysis of LV function after stress and at rest to detect extensive CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Poststress and resting gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed in 175 patients with suspected CAD. All of the patients underwent coronary angiography within 3 months of gated SPECT. In the 83 patients with multivessel CAD, the summed difference score was greater (9.2 +/- 7.0 vs 3.3 +/- 4.0, P < .0001), the poststress increase in end-systolic volume (ESV) was larger (7.0 +/- 8.0 mL vs -0.8 +/- 4.7 mL, P < .0001), and the poststress increase in ejection fraction (EF) was less (-4.7% +/- 5.4% vs -0.4% +/- 4.5%, P < .0001) than in the 92 patients with insignificant or single-vessel CAD. In the detection of multivessel CAD, a summed difference score of 9 or greater showed a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 90%, whereas an increase in ESV of 5 mL or greater and a decrease in EF of 5% or greater after exercise had a sensitivity of 66% and 52%, respectively, and specificity of 87% and 83%, respectively. The multivariate discriminant analysis revealed that the combination of poststress increase in ESV, summed difference score, and diabetes mellitus best identified multivessel CAD, with a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 84% (chi(2), 81.7). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of poststress and at-rest LV functional analysis by use of gated SPECT to conventional perfusion analysis helps to better identify patients with multivessel CAD.
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L L Johnson; S A Verdesca; W Y Aude; R C Xavier; L T Nott; M W Campanella; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M B Mock; I Ringqvist; L D Fisher; K B Davis; B R Chaitman; N T Kouchoukos; G C Kaiser; E Alderman; T J Ryan; R O Russell; S Mullin; D Fray; T Killip Journal: Circulation Date: 1982-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P Camici; L I Araujo; T Spinks; A A Lammertsma; J C Kaski; M J Shea; A P Selwyn; T Jones; A Maseri Journal: Circulation Date: 1986-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Mazzanti; G Germano; H Kiat; P B Kavanagh; E Alexanderson; J D Friedman; R Hachamovitch; K F Van Train; D S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: F J Wackers; D S Berman; J Maddahi; D D Watson; G A Beller; H W Strauss; C A Boucher; M Picard; B L Holman; R Fridrich Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1989-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Enrique Vallejo; Juan Carlos Pelaez; Oscar Quiroz; Bertha Alcala; Jose Luis Ramirez-Arias Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008-07-26 Impact factor: 5.952