BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the diagnostic performance of a recently developed combined supine-prone quantification algorithm for myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive MPS scans of women without known CAD and coronary angiography within 3 months of MPS (n = 168) and with a low likelihood of CAD (n = 291) were considered. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) was automatically derived for supine (S-TPD), prone (P-TPD), and combined prone-supine (C-TPD) data sets. The low-likelihood patients were grouped by bra cup size (A/B, n = 102; C, n = 101; and D, n = 88). The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves for S-TPD, P-TPD, and C-TPD were 0.84 +/- 0.03, 0.88 +/- 0.03, and 0.90 +/- 0.03, respectively. C-TPD had a higher specificity than S-TPD and P-TPD for identification of CAD (stenosis > or =70%) without compromising sensitivity (61%, 76%, and 94% for S-, P-, and C-TPD, respectively; P < .0005 vs S-TPD and P < .05 vs P-TPD). Normalcy rates were higher for C-TPD than for S-TPD or P-TPD. CONCLUSIONS: Combined supine-prone quantitative MPS in women yields significantly increased specificity and normalcy rates without compromising sensitivity for the detection of CAD compared with standard analysis.
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the diagnostic performance of a recently developed combined supine-prone quantification algorithm for myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive MPS scans of women without known CAD and coronary angiography within 3 months of MPS (n = 168) and with a low likelihood of CAD (n = 291) were considered. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) was automatically derived for supine (S-TPD), prone (P-TPD), and combined prone-supine (C-TPD) data sets. The low-likelihood patients were grouped by bra cup size (A/B, n = 102; C, n = 101; and D, n = 88). The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves for S-TPD, P-TPD, and C-TPD were 0.84 +/- 0.03, 0.88 +/- 0.03, and 0.90 +/- 0.03, respectively. C-TPD had a higher specificity than S-TPD and P-TPD for identification of CAD (stenosis > or =70%) without compromising sensitivity (61%, 76%, and 94% for S-, P-, and C-TPD, respectively; P < .0005 vs S-TPD and P < .05 vs P-TPD). Normalcy rates were higher for C-TPD than for S-TPD or P-TPD. CONCLUSIONS: Combined supine-prone quantitative MPS in women yields significantly increased specificity and normalcy rates without compromising sensitivity for the detection of CAD compared with standard analysis.
Authors: Robert C Hendel; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; E Gordon DePuey; Ernest V Garcia; Timothy M Bateman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Hidetaka Nishina; Daniel S Berman; Cigdem Akincioglu; Aiden Abidov; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Hidetaka Nishina; Piotr J Slomka; Aiden Abidov; Shunichi Yoda; Cigdem Akincioglu; Xingping Kang; Ishac Cohen; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M L Ladenheim; B H Pollock; A Rozanski; D S Berman; H M Staniloff; J S Forrester; G A Diamond Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1986-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; N Bairey-Merz; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J D Friedman; G Germano; K F Van Train; G A Diamond Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-11-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Thomas A Holly; Brian G Abbott; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Dennis A Calnon; Mylan C Cohen; Frank P DiFilippo; Edward P Ficaro; Michael R Freeman; Robert C Hendel; Diwakar Jain; Scott M Leonard; Kenneth J Nichols; Donna M Polk; Prem Soman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Olakunle O Akinboboye; Daniel S Berman; Elias H Botvinick; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; Regina S Druz; Edward P Ficaro; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Guido Germano; Gary V Heller; Milena J Henzlova; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Robert A Quaife; Terrence D Ruddy; Senthil N Sundaram; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Reza Arsanjani; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Aryeh Shalev; Rine Nakanishi; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr Slomka Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 5.952