Literature DB >> 17275641

An anatomical study of tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal mismatch during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Roy Abraham1, Arthur L Malkani, Jason Lewis, Dennis Beck.   

Abstract

This cadaveric study determines the relationship of the tibial metaphysis and intramedullary canal of the tibia (diaphysis), particularly relating to revision knee arthroplasty. A total knee arthroplasty was performed in 20 cadaveric tibiae using revision instrumentation with a canal-filling uncemented stem. The offset, which is the distance between the center of the tibial canal and the center of the tibial metaphysis, was measured using the revision system offset bushing. The average distance between the center of the tibial metaphysis and the center of the tibial diaphysis was 4.1 mm (+/-2.9 mm) with an average angle of 105 degrees (0 degrees -70 degrees ). The mean offset was 4.1 mm (+/-2.9) and the mean offset angle was 105 degrees (0 degrees -350 degrees ). The study confirms the center of the tibial diaphysis is not congruous with the center of the metaphysis with wide variations in offsets among individuals. A wide range of offsets are necessary for optimum placement of implants.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17275641     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo Franceschini
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Biomechanical analysis of the tibial tray design in TKA: comparison between modular and offset tibial trays.

Authors:  Ângela Chan; João Gamelas; João Folgado; Paulo R Fernandes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The entry point of intramedullary tibia cutting guide should vary according to the individual tibia morphology in TKA.

Authors:  Sung-Mok Oh; Seong-Il Bin; Bum-Sik Lee; Jong-Min Kim
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Tibial shaft anatomy differs between Caucasians and East Asian individuals.

Authors:  Hongyi Shao; Chilung Chen; Daniel Scholl; Ahmad Faizan; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The offset of the tibia plateau of osteoarthritis patients: a single-center study.

Authors:  Xiang-Dong Yun; Li-Ping An; Jin Jiang; Jun-Jie Mao; Cui-Fang Wang; Jing Wang; Jing-Lin Ma; Ya-Yi Xia
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

6.  Evaluation of the rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: position prioritizing maximum coverage.

Authors:  Masashi Hirakawa; Masashi Miyazaki; Shinichi Ikeda; Yoshiki Matsumoto; Makoto Kondo; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-10

7.  Biomechanical effect of anatomical tibial component design on load distribution of medial proximal tibial bone in total knee arthroplasty : finite element analysis indicating anatomical design prevents stress-shielding.

Authors:  Byung W Cho; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hyuck M Kwon; Woo-Suk Lee; Ick H Yang; Ji H Nam; Yong-Gon Koh; Kwan K Park
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.410

8.  The prevalence of posterolateral tibial baseplate overhang: An anatomical CT study.

Authors:  Sanar S Yokhana; D Alex Hamilton; Sasha A Stine; Lauren N Stimson; Abdul K Zalikha; Chaoyang Chen; Hussein F Darwiche
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-09

9.  Is there a difference in joint line restoration in revision Total knee arthroplasty according to prosthesis type?

Authors:  JuHong Lee; SungIl Wang; KiBum Kim
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.