Literature DB >> 26464429

Architecture design of a generic centralized adjudication module integrated in a web-based clinical trial management system.

Wenle Zhao1, Keith Pauls2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Centralized outcome adjudication has been used widely in multicenter clinical trials in order to prevent potential biases and to reduce variations in important safety and efficacy outcome assessments. Adjudication procedures could vary significantly among different studies. In practice, the coordination of outcome adjudication procedures in many multicenter clinical trials remains as a manual process with low efficiency and high risk of delay. Motivated by the demands from two large clinical trial networks, a generic outcome adjudication module has been developed by the network's data management center within a homegrown clinical trial management system. In this article, the system design strategy and database structure are presented.
METHODS: A generic database model was created to transfer different adjudication procedures into a unified set of sequential adjudication steps. Each adjudication step was defined by one activate condition, one lock condition, one to five categorical data items to capture adjudication results, and one free text field for general comments. Based on this model, a generic outcome adjudication user interface and a generic data processing program were developed within a homegrown clinical trial management system to provide automated coordination of outcome adjudication.
RESULTS: By the end of 2014, this generic outcome adjudication module had been implemented in 10 multicenter trials. A total of 29 adjudication procedures were defined with the number of adjudication steps varying from 1 to 7. The implementation of a new adjudication procedure in this generic module took an experienced programmer 1 or 2 days. A total of 7336 outcome events had been adjudicated and 16,235 adjudication step activities had been recorded. In a multicenter trial, 1144 safety outcome event submissions went through a three-step adjudication procedure and reported a median of 3.95 days from safety event case report form submission to adjudication completion. In another trial, 277 clinical outcome events were adjudicated by a six-step procedure and took a median of 23.84 days from outcome event case report form submission to adjudication procedure completion.
CONCLUSION: A generic outcome adjudication module integrated in the clinical trial management system made the automated coordination of efficacy and safety outcome adjudication a reality.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; clinical trial management system; endpoint adjudication; medical safety monitoring; outcome adjudication

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26464429      PMCID: PMC4785064          DOI: 10.1177/1740774515611889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs.

Authors:  Janice Pogue; Stephen D Walter; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 2.  Guidelines for fracture healing assessments in clinical trials. Part II: electronic data capture and image management systems--Global Adjudicator™ system.

Authors:  Natalie Kuurstra; Christopher Vannabouathong; Sheila Sprague; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Central adjudication of venous ultrasound in VTE screening trials: reasons for failure.

Authors:  J Beyer-Westendorf; K Halbritter; H Platzbecker; U Damme; B Neugebauer; E Kuhlisch; S Schellong
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  A web-based medical safety reporting system for a large multicenter clinical trial: the ALIAS experience.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Bonnie D Waldman; Catherine Dillon; Keith Pauls; Jaemyung Kim; Lynn Patterson; Myron D Ginsberg; Michael D Hill; Yuko Palesch
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  A web-based clinical trial management system for a sham-controlled multicenter clinical trial in depression.

Authors:  Valerie Durkalski; Catherine Dillon; Jaemyung Kim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  An electronic regulatory document management system for a clinical trial network.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Valerie Durkalski; Keith Pauls; Catherine Dillon; Jaemyung Kim; Deneil Kolk; Robert Silbergleit; Valerie Stevenson; Yuko Palesch
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Observer variation in the assessment of outcome in traumatic brain injury: experience from a multicenter, international randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J T Lindsay Wilson; Frans J A Slieker; Valerie Legrand; Gordon Murray; Nino Stocchetti; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  A web-based endpoint adjudication system for interim analyses in clinical trials.

Authors:  Tracy L Nolen; Bill F Dimmick; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Amy S Kendrick; Carole Sable; Angela Ngai; Dennis Wallace
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Clinical Trials: Minimising source data queries to streamline endpoint adjudication in a large multi-national trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Tolmie; Eleanor M Dinnett; Elizabeth S Ronald; Allan Gaw
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Data quality challenges in systemic lupus erythematosus trials: how can this be optimized?

Authors:  Marilyn C Pike; Lexy Kelley
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.592

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Key components and IT assistance of participant management in clinical research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Johannes Pung; Otto Rienhoff
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-10-14

2.  Creating an academic research organization to efficiently design, conduct, coordinate, and analyze clinical trials: The Center for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination.

Authors:  Kaleab Z Abebe; Andrew D Althouse; Diane Comer; Kyle Holleran; Glory Koerbel; Jason Kojtek; Joseph Weiss; Susan Spillane
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-11-12

3.  Utilization of a Clinical Trial Management System for the Whole Clinical Trial Process as an Integrated Database: System Development.

Authors:  Yu Rang Park; Young Jo Yoon; HaYeong Koo; Soyoung Yoo; Chang-Min Choi; Sung-Ho Beck; Tae Won Kim
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Assessment of the End Point Adjudication Process on the Results of the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trial: A Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Mary Farrant; J Donald Easton; Eric E Adelman; Brett L Cucchiara; William G Barsan; Holly J Tillman; Jordan J Elm; Anthony S Kim; Anne S Lindblad; Yuko Y Palesch; Wenle Zhao; Keith Pauls; Kyle B Walsh; Joan Martí-Fàbregas; Richard A Bernstein; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.