Literature DB >> 17268215

Evaluation of the dose response with valsartan and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension.

Matthew R Weir1, Nora Crikelair, Drew Levy, Ricardo Rocha, Venkatram Kuturu, Robert Glazer.   

Abstract

This patient data meta-analysis included 9 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N=4278) of once-daily valsartan 80, 160, or 320 mg or valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 80/12.5, 160/12.5, 160/25, 320/12.5, or 320/25 mg given for 4 to 8 weeks. Efficacy variables included: (1) mean change in systolic blood pressure (BP) and diastolic BP; and (2) proportion of patients reaching BP goal (<140/90 mm Hg) at the end of the study. Results showed that incremental systolic and diastolic BP reductions were achieved with increasing doses. Starting doses of valsartan 160 mg provided greater BP reductions and a higher proportion of patients reaching goal than 80 mg; combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy. BP goal rates increased incrementally with higher doses. With valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 320/25 mg, 74.9% overall, 88.8% of stage 1, and 62.1% of stage 2 patients reached BP goal. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was low with both monotherapy and combination treatment. Higher starting doses may enable patients to achieve greater initial BP reductions and reach BP goal more rapidly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17268215      PMCID: PMC8110071          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06415.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  32 in total

1.  A noninferiority comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination versus amlodipine in black hypertensives.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Keith C Ferdinand; John M Flack; Kenneth A Jamerson; William Daley; Steven Zelenkofske
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Dose-responsive antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, a new angiotensin II-receptor blocker.

Authors:  J Pool; S Oparil; T Hedner; R Glazer; P Oddou-Stock; A Hester
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapy: the importance of actual practice data.

Authors:  J J Caro; J L Speckman; M Salas; G Raggio; J D Jackson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-01-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Identification of risk factors in hypertensive patients: contribution of randomized controlled trials through an individual patient database.

Authors:  F Gueyffier; J P Boissel; S Pocock; F Boutitie; J Coope; J Cutler; T Ekbom; R Fagard; L Friedman; K Kerlikowske; M Perry; R Prineas; E Schron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy and safety compared with placebo and enalapril.

Authors:  N J Holwerda; R Fogari; P Angeli; C Porcellati; C Hereng; P Oddou-Stock; R Heath; F Bodin
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 6.  Angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

Authors:  M Burnier; H R Brunner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; John Kjekshus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both.

Authors:  Marc A Pfeffer; John J V McMurray; Eric J Velazquez; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Lars Køber; Aldo P Maggioni; Scott D Solomon; Karl Swedberg; Frans Van de Werf; Harvey White; Jeffrey D Leimberger; Marc Henis; Susan Edwards; Steven Zelenkofske; Mary Ann Sellers; Robert M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Combination angiotensin receptor blocker/hydrochlorothiazide as initial therapy in the treatment of patients with severe hypertension.

Authors:  Christina M Salerno; Laura Demopoulos; Robin Mukherjee; Alan H Gradman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Hazel Mae A Abraham; C Michael White; William B White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Valsartan: more than a decade of experience.

Authors:  Henry R Black; Jacqueline Bailey; Dion Zappe; Rita Samuel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The efficacy and safety of valsartan in obese and non-obese pediatric hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Kevin E C Meyers; Kenneth Lieberman; Susan Solar-Yohay; Guangyang Han; Victor Shi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Treating systolic hypertension in the very elderly with valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide vs. either monotherapy: ValVET primary results.

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo; Howard S Weintraub; Daniel A Duprez; Das Purkayastha; Dion Zappe; Rita Samuel; William C Cushman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Combination therapy with Renin-Angiotensin-aldosterone receptor blockers for hypertension: how far have we come?

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Combination therapy with lercanidipine and enalapril in the management of the hypertensive patient: an update of the evidence.

Authors:  Christina Antza; Stella Stabouli; Vasilios Kotsis
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2016-11-15

7.  Blood pressure goal achievement with olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment: additional analysis of the OLMEBEST study.

Authors:  Vivencio Barrios; Carlos Escobar; Alberto Calderon; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-09-07

8.  Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control.

Authors:  Dion Zappe; Cheraz Cherif Papst; Philippe Ferber
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-02

9.  Influence of Age and Race on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Responses to Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide, and Their Combination: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo; Yan Jia; Dion H Zappe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.