Literature DB >> 12241832

Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

Kenneth Dickstein1, John Kjekshus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ACE inhibitors attenuate the detrimental effects of angiotensin II, and improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute myocardial infarction and evidence of heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction. Selective antagonism of the angiotensin type 1 receptor represents an alternative approach to inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. We did a multicentre, randomised trial to test the hypothesis that the angiotensin II antagonist losartan would be superior or non-inferior to the ACE inhibitor captopril in decreasing all-cause mortality in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS: 5477 patients 50 years of age or older (mean age 67.4 years [SD 9.8]), with confirmed acute myocardial infarction and heart failure during the acute phase or a new Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction, were recruited from 329 centres in seven European countries. Patients were randomly assigned and titrated to a target dose of losartan (50 mg once daily) or captopril (50 mg three times daily) as tolerated. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: There were 946 deaths during a mean follow-up of 2.7 (0.9) years: 499 (18%) in the losartan group and 447 (16%) in the captopril group (relative risk 1.13 [95% CI 0.99-1.28], p=0.07). The results for the secondary and tertiary endpoints were as follows: sudden cardiac death or resuscitated cardiac arrest 239 (9%) versus 203 (7%), 1.19 (0.98-1.43), p=0.07, and fatal or non-fatal reinfarction 384 (14%) versus 379 (14%), 1.03 (0.89-1.18), p=0.72. The all-cause hospital admission rates were 1806 (66%) versus 1774 (65%), 1.03 (0.97-1.10), p=0.37. Losartan was significantly better tolerated than captopril, with fewer patients discontinuing study medication (458 [17%] vs 624 [23%], 0.70 [0.62-0.79], p<0.0001).
INTERPRETATION: Since we saw a non-significant difference in total mortality in favour of captopril, ACE inhibitors should remain first-choice treatment in patients after complicated acute myocardial infarction. Losartan cannot be generally recommended in this population. However, it was better tolerated than captopril, and was associated with significantly fewer discontinuations. Although the role of losartan in patients intolerant of ACE inhibition is not clearly defined, it can be considered in such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12241832     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09895-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  188 in total

Review 1.  The benefit of angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers for early treatment of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Bruno Trimarco; Ciro Santoro; Marco Pepe; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Effects of telmisartan on markers of ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction: comparison with enalapril.

Authors:  Takashi Yokota; Tomohiro Osanai; Kenji Hanada; Motoi Kushibiki; Naoki Abe; Koichi Oikawa; Hirofumi Tomita; Takumi Higuma; Jin Yokoyama; Hiroyuki Hanada; Ken Okumura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  [AT(1) blocker for post-infarct therapy. VALIANT Study].

Authors:  G Hasenfuss
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Heart attack patients with complications. Treat with valsartan, captopril, or both?

Authors:  Anne Nguyen; Sudheer Sharma
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Angiotensin receptor blockers and tumorigenesis: something to be (or not to be) concerned about?

Authors:  Vadim Tchaikovski; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Sara M Debanne; Douglas Y Rowland; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Direct renin inhibition: from pharmacological innovation to novel therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Roberto Pontremoli; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 8.  Losartan: a review of its use in stroke risk reduction in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Marit D Moen; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have similar clinical efficacy after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Morten L Hansen; Gunnar H Gislason; Lars Køber; Tina Ken Schramm; Fredrik Folke; Pernille Buch; Steen Z Abildstrom; Mette Madsen; Søren Rasmussen; Christian Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  RAS blockade with ARB and ACE inhibitors: current perspective on rationale and patient selection.

Authors:  Christian Werner; Magnus Baumhäkel; Koon K Teo; Roland Schmieder; Johannes Mann; Thomas Unger; Salim Yusuf; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.