Literature DB >> 16116046

A noninferiority comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination versus amlodipine in black hypertensives.

Matthew R Weir1, Keith C Ferdinand, John M Flack, Kenneth A Jamerson, William Daley, Steven Zelenkofske.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to demonstrate that reduction in mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure with 160 mg valsartan and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide was not inferior to 10 mg amlodipine in hypertensive blacks. A total of 482 blacks with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension (mean seated blood pressure 140 to 180/90 to 110 mm Hg) were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, prospective study. After a placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to 160 mg valsartan or 5 mg amlodipine for 2 weeks, then force-titrated to 160 mg valsartan and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide or 10 mg amlodipine for an additional 10 weeks. Blood pressure was assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Other assessments included quality of life, peripheral edema, and safety. Noninferiority of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide to amlodipine was demonstrated by comparable reductions in mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure with both treatments (-10.2+/-8.6 mm Hg versus -9.1+/-8.3 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.001 for noninferiority), as well as in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure (-15.9+/-12.1 mm Hg versus -14.5+/-12.2 mm Hg; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The proportion of patients reporting adverse events and the incidence of most events were similar in both treatment groups, although more patients treated with amlodipine reported peripheral edema (5.8% versus 1.7%; P=0.03) and joint swelling (2.9% versus 0%; P=0.008) compared with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide. We conclude that a starting dose of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (160/12.5 mg) is as effective as high-dose amlodipine (10 mg) in reducing blood pressure in blacks with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension, and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16116046     DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000180457.82483.6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  7 in total

Review 1.  Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Valsartan: more than a decade of experience.

Authors:  Henry R Black; Jacqueline Bailey; Dion Zappe; Rita Samuel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Office and ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide vs. hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy in obese, hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Leopoldo Raij; Brent M Egan; Dion H Zappe; Das Purkayastha; Rita Samuel; James R Sowers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Evaluation of the dose response with valsartan and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Nora Crikelair; Drew Levy; Ricardo Rocha; Venkatram Kuturu; Robert Glazer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Combination therapy with Renin-Angiotensin-aldosterone receptor blockers for hypertension: how far have we come?

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control.

Authors:  Dion Zappe; Cheraz Cherif Papst; Philippe Ferber
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-02

Review 7.  Cardiovascular disease in blacks: can we stop the clock?

Authors:  Keith C Ferdinand
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.