Literature DB >> 17267751

The time course of stimulus expectation in a saccadic decision task.

A Oswal1, Miriam Ogden, R H S Carpenter.   

Abstract

Because the time to respond to a stimulus depend markedly on expectation, measurements of reaction time can, conversely, provide information about the brain's estimate of the probability of a stimulus. Previous studies have shown that the quantitative relationship between reaction time and static, long-term expectation or prior probability can be explained economically by the LATER model of decision reaction time. What is not known, however, is how the neural representation of expectation changes in the short term, as a result of immediate cues. Here, we manipulate the foreperiod-the delay between the start of a trial and the appearance of the stimulus-to see how saccadic latency, and thus expectation, varies with different delays. It appears that LATER can provide a quantitative explanation of this relationship, in terms both of average latencies and of their statistical distribution. We also show that expectancy appears to be subject to a process of low-pass filtering, analogous to the spatial blur that degrades visual acuity.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17267751     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01238.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  Ultrafast initiation of a neural race by impending errors.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A single mechanism for the timing of spontaneous and evoked saccades.

Authors:  J C P Roos; D M Calandrini; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dual LATER-unit model predicts saccadic reaction time distributions in gap, step and appearance tasks.

Authors:  Giles W Story; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment.

Authors:  Timothy Doyeon Kim; Mohammad Kabir; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial Attention and Temporal Expectation Under Timed Uncertainty Predictably Modulate Neuronal Responses in Monkey V1.

Authors:  Jitendra Sharma; Hiroki Sugihara; Yarden Katz; James Schummers; Joshua Tenenbaum; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Oculomotor inhibitory control in express saccade makers.

Authors:  Felicity D A Wolohan; Paul C Knox
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Anticipation of future events improves the ability to estimate elapsed time.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Tsunoda; Shinji Kakei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Validity and Repeatability of Saccadic Response Times Across the Visual Field in Eye Movement Perimetry.

Authors:  Johan J M Pel; Michel C M van Beijsterveld; Gijs Thepass; Johannes van der Steen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Kay H Brodersen; Will D Penny; Lee M Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Christian C Ruff; Emrah Duzel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.