BACKGROUND: Newly qualified doctors should be competent in advanced life support (ALS) and critical care. The Resuscitation Council has published a course about ALS for undergraduate medical students (the intermediate life support (ILS) course). However, there is no undergraduate-level course on assessing and treating critically ill patients, despite the fact that postgraduate courses on this topic are extremely popular. We have developed a new course called Direct Response Workshop for House Officer Preparation (DR WHO), which teaches both ALS and critical care at an undergraduate level. METHODS: We taught the Resuscitation Council ILS course to our 2003-4 cohort of final year medical students (n = 350), and the new course (DR WHO) to our 2004-5 cohort (n = 338). Students filled in feedback forms immediately after the courses, and a subset repeated the feedback forms 4 months after they had started work as house officers. Course evaluation: Student and house officer feedback was positive. The DR WHO cohort was more confident in caring for critically ill patients (18/26 (69%) were confident after ILS, and 40/45 (89%) were confident after DR WHO (chi2 = 4.3; df = 1; p = 0.06)). Both cohorts were competent in ALS, each with a mean score of 18.6/20 in a finals level practical examination on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: The DR WHO course is popular with the students and practical to run. The course needs to be re-evaluated to determine the long-term competency of graduates.
BACKGROUND: Newly qualified doctors should be competent in advanced life support (ALS) and critical care. The Resuscitation Council has published a course about ALS for undergraduate medical students (the intermediate life support (ILS) course). However, there is no undergraduate-level course on assessing and treating critically illpatients, despite the fact that postgraduate courses on this topic are extremely popular. We have developed a new course called Direct Response Workshop for House Officer Preparation (DR WHO), which teaches both ALS and critical care at an undergraduate level. METHODS: We taught the Resuscitation Council ILS course to our 2003-4 cohort of final year medical students (n = 350), and the new course (DR WHO) to our 2004-5 cohort (n = 338). Students filled in feedback forms immediately after the courses, and a subset repeated the feedback forms 4 months after they had started work as house officers. Course evaluation: Student and house officer feedback was positive. The DR WHO cohort was more confident in caring for critically illpatients (18/26 (69%) were confident after ILS, and 40/45 (89%) were confident after DR WHO (chi2 = 4.3; df = 1; p = 0.06)). Both cohorts were competent in ALS, each with a mean score of 18.6/20 in a finals level practical examination on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: The DR WHO course is popular with the students and practical to run. The course needs to be re-evaluated to determine the long-term competency of graduates.
Authors: Randolph H Steadman; Wendy C Coates; Yue Ming Huang; Rima Matevosian; Baxter R Larmon; Lynne McCullough; Danit Ariel Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gavin D Perkins; Hannah Barrett; Ian Bullock; David A Gabbott; Jerry P Nolan; Sarah Mitchell; Alasdair Short; Christopher M Smith; Gary B Smith; Susan Todd; Julian F Bion Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-10-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Timothy J Hodgetts; Gary Kenward; Ioannis Vlackonikolis; Susan Payne; Nicolas Castle; Robert Crouch; Neil Ineson; Loua Shaikh Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Juliane Kause; Gary Smith; David Prytherch; Michael Parr; Arthas Flabouris; Ken Hillman Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.262