OBJECTIVE: The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) constitutes an absolute level of patient well-being and represents an ambitious target for disease management. We explored contributors to PASS, validated the PASS concept, and assessed thresholds of self-reported outcomes below which patients considered themselves in PASS. METHODS: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis completed a questionnaire that included self-reported assessments of pain, fatigue, disease activity, function, patient global, quality of life (QOL), and whether they considered their current disease state satisfactory or not. Stepwise logistic regression was used to assess contributors to PASS. PASS was validated by analyzing proportions of patients reporting need for a rheumatologist and who were in current flare. PASS thresholds for self-reported outcomes were estimated using an anchoring method based on the patient's opinion and targeting the 75th percentile of the cumulative distribution. RESULTS: PASS data were available for 291 patients, of whom 169 (58%) were in PASS. Significant contributors were age (Exp[B] 1.05; P = 0.003), patient global disease activity (Exp[B] 0.79; P = 0.008), and function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]; Exp[B] 0.72; P < 0.001). PASS reflected need to consult the rheumatologist and current flare (71% and 73% correctly classified, respectively) and significantly contributed to QOL (B = -5.99; 95% confidence interval -7.16, -4.08). PASS thresholds were 5.0 for patient global disease activity, 5.0 for total back pain, 22.8 for fatigue, 4.8 for disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), and 4.0 for function (BASFI). CONCLUSION: A majority of patients (58%) reported being in PASS. PASS thresholds for pain and function were unexpectedly high, possibly suggesting adaptation to the consequences of the disease.
OBJECTIVE: The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) constitutes an absolute level of patient well-being and represents an ambitious target for disease management. We explored contributors to PASS, validated the PASS concept, and assessed thresholds of self-reported outcomes below which patients considered themselves in PASS. METHODS:Patients with ankylosing spondylitis completed a questionnaire that included self-reported assessments of pain, fatigue, disease activity, function, patient global, quality of life (QOL), and whether they considered their current disease state satisfactory or not. Stepwise logistic regression was used to assess contributors to PASS. PASS was validated by analyzing proportions of patients reporting need for a rheumatologist and who were in current flare. PASS thresholds for self-reported outcomes were estimated using an anchoring method based on the patient's opinion and targeting the 75th percentile of the cumulative distribution. RESULTS: PASS data were available for 291 patients, of whom 169 (58%) were in PASS. Significant contributors were age (Exp[B] 1.05; P = 0.003), patient global disease activity (Exp[B] 0.79; P = 0.008), and function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]; Exp[B] 0.72; P < 0.001). PASS reflected need to consult the rheumatologist and current flare (71% and 73% correctly classified, respectively) and significantly contributed to QOL (B = -5.99; 95% confidence interval -7.16, -4.08). PASS thresholds were 5.0 for patient global disease activity, 5.0 for total back pain, 22.8 for fatigue, 4.8 for disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), and 4.0 for function (BASFI). CONCLUSION: A majority of patients (58%) reported being in PASS. PASS thresholds for pain and function were unexpectedly high, possibly suggesting adaptation to the consequences of the disease.
Authors: Tamar F Brionez; Shervin Assassi; John D Reveille; Charles Green; Thomas Learch; Laura Diekman; Michael M Ward; John C Davis; Michael H Weisman; Perry Nicassio Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Gui Tran; Bright Dube; Sarah R Kingsbury; Alan Tennant; Philip G Conaghan; Elizabeth M A Hensor Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Fatmah Hasani; Terry Haines; Shannon E Munteanu; Peter Schoch; Bill Vicenzino; Peter Malliaras Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Date: 2021-05-25
Authors: Sara Khor; David R Flum; Lisa L Strate; Mariam N Hantouli; Heather M Harris; Danielle C Lavallee; Brennan Mr Spiegel; Giana H Davidson Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 2.417
Authors: Fausto Salaffi; Marina Carotti; Marwin Gutierrez; Marco Di Carlo; Rossella De Angelis Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Ying Ying Leung; Ana-Maria Orbai; Maarten de Wit; Andra Balanescu; Emmanuelle Dernis; Martin Soubrier; Lihi Eder; Josef S Smolen; Laura C Coates; Laure Gossec Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Tamar F Brionez; Shervin Assassi; John D Reveille; Thomas J Learch; Laura Diekman; Michael M Ward; John C Davis; Michael H Weisman; Perry Nicassio Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 5.156