Literature DB >> 17265169

Outcomes of vaginal vault prolapse repair with a high uterosacral suspension procedure utilizing bilateral single sutures.

Thomas L Wheeler1, Kimberly A Gerten, Holly E Richter, Angela G Duke, R Edward Varner.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe an approach for performing a high uterosacral vaginal vault suspension and to report anatomical and subjective results. Anatomic measures and validated symptom-specific questionnaires were performed pre- and postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was also ascertained. Thirty-five women, who underwent a two-suture high uterosacral suspension, participated. Mean follow-up interval was 23.1+/-10.1 months. Postoperative point C was -7.8+/-1.60 (median, -8.0, range, -4.0 to -10.0), and the mean preoperative to postoperative change in point C was 5.9+/-5.56 cm (median 4.75, range -3.0 to 20.0, p-value<0.0001). Patient satisfaction was high with 88.9% indicating that they would have the surgery again. There were no ureteral injuries or kinks noted on intraoperative cystoscopy. No patient required reoperation for recurrent prolapse or urinary incontinence. Overall, the two-suture high uterosacral vaginal vault suspension is an acceptable technique for repairing apical prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17265169     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0305-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  15 in total

1.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Outcomes with porcine graft placement in the anterior vaginal compartment in patients who undergo high vaginal uterosacral suspension and cystocele repair.

Authors:  Thomas L Wheeler; Holly E Richter; Angela G Duke; Kathryn L Burgio; David T Redden; R Edward Varner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A new look at pelvic relaxation.

Authors:  A C Richardson; J B Lyon; N L Williams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  M Karram; S Goldwasser; S Kleeman; A Steele; B Vassallo; P Walsh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Low risk of ureteral obstruction with "deep" (dorsal/posterior) uterosacral ligament suture placement for transvaginal apical suspension.

Authors:  Michael P Aronson; Patricia K Aronson; Allison E Howard; Abraham N Morse; Stephen P Baker; Stephen B Young
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments.

Authors:  B L Shull; C Bachofen; K W Coates; T J Kuehl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; J F Wyman; S A Shumaker; D K McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for ureteral occlusion during transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension.

Authors:  Elisha Jackson; Jorge A Bilbao; Robert W Vera; Zuber D Mulla; Veronica T Mallett; T Ignacio Montoya
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Permanent suture used in uterosacral ligament suspension offers better anatomical support than delayed absorbable suture.

Authors:  Christopher P Chung; Richard Miskimins; Thomas J Kuehl; Paul M Yandell; Bobby L Shull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rodolfo Milani; Matteo Frigerio; Federico Spelzini; Stefano Manodoro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Long-term outcomes of modified high uterosacral ligament vault suspension (HUSLS) at vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Stergios K Doumouchtsis; Azar Khunda; Stephen T Jeffery; Anna Virginia M Franco; Michelle M Fynes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Suture complications in a teaching institution among patients undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension with permanent braided suture.

Authors:  Tajnoos Yazdany; Sallis Yip; Narender N Bhatia; John N Nguyen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.