Literature DB >> 16647932

Outcomes with porcine graft placement in the anterior vaginal compartment in patients who undergo high vaginal uterosacral suspension and cystocele repair.

Thomas L Wheeler1, Holly E Richter, Angela G Duke, Kathryn L Burgio, David T Redden, R Edward Varner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the cases of patients who had undergone a high uterosacral suspension and anterior repair with anterior compartment placement of porcine dermis graft. STUDY
DESIGN: Thirty-six patients who underwent transvaginal high uterosacral suspension and cystocele repair with graft augmentation from June 2001 to July 2004 were identified from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Genitourinary Disorders database. Analysis included the pre- and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examinations and incontinence impact questionnaire-7/urogenital distress inventory-6.
RESULTS: Mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Ba improved from +3.3 +/- 2.2 cm to -0.6 +/- 1.7 cm (P < .01). Postoperative Ba was prolapse stage II or greater in 50% of subjects. Mean incontinence impact questionnaire-7 scores improved from 36.2 +/- 31.9 to 15.6 +/- 26.2 (P < .01), as did mean urogenital distress inventory-6 scores from 58.2 +/- 26.8 to 23.8 +/- 22.6 (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measures, urinary symptoms, and the impact of incontinence were seen after the operation. However, a significant proportion of patients had Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage II prolapse or greater, which made it unclear whether graft use confers a significant advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647932     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  The outcome of transobturator cystocele repair using biocompatible porcine dermis graft: our experience with 32 cases.

Authors:  Ayman Mahdy; Mostafa Elmissiry; Gamal Ghoniem
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-05

2.  Long-term results of vaginal repairs with and without xenograft reinforcement.

Authors:  Lone Mouritsen; Manuela Kronschnabl; Gunnar Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Anterior compartment prolapse repair with a hybrid biosynthetic mesh implant technique.

Authors:  Jose E Robles; Jorge Rioja; Abel Saiz; Xavier Brugarolas; David Rosell; J Javier Zudaire; Jose M Berian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-24

4.  Outcomes of vaginal vault prolapse repair with a high uterosacral suspension procedure utilizing bilateral single sutures.

Authors:  Thomas L Wheeler; Kimberly A Gerten; Holly E Richter; Angela G Duke; R Edward Varner
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-31

Review 5.  Prolapse and incontinence surgery in older women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Gerten; Alayne D Markland; L Keith Lloyd; Holly E Richter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Experimental biomechanical evaluation of polypropylene prostheses used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Fabrice Sergent; Nicolas Desilles; Yann Lacoume; Claude Bunel; Jean-Paul Marie; Loïc Marpeau
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05

Review 7.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Anterior vaginal compartment surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.