Literature DB >> 28712023

Selection of Potential Probiotic Lactobacillus with Inhibitory Activity Against Salmonella and Fecal Coliform Bacteria.

Mattika Abhisingha1, Jureeporn Dumnil1, Chetsadaporn Pitaksutheepong2.   

Abstract

Three hundred and sixty presumptive lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from pregnant sows, newborn, suckling, and weaned piglets were preliminarily screened for anti-Salmonella activity. Fifty-eight isolates consisting of Lactobacillus reuteri (n = 32), Lactobacillus salivarius (n = 10), Lactobacillus mucosae (n = 8), Lactobacillus johnsonii (n = 5), and Lactobacillus crispatus (n = 3) were selected and further characterized for probiotic properties including production of antimicrobial substances, acid and bile tolerance, and cell adherence to Caco-2 cells. Eight isolates including Lact. johnsonii LJ202 and Lact. reuteri LR108 were identified as potential probiotics. LJ202 was selected for further use in co-culture studies of two-bacterial and multiple-bacterial species to examine its inhibitory activity against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis DMST7106 (SE7106). Co-culture of LJ202 and SE7106 showed that LJ202 could completely inhibit the growth of SE7106 in 10 h of co-culture. In co-culture of multiple-bacterial species, culturable fecal bacteria from pig feces were used as representative of multiple-bacterial species. The study was performed to examine whether interactions among multiple-bacterial species would influence antagonistic activity of LJ202 against SE7106 and fecal coliform bacteria. Co-culture of SE7106 with different combinations of fecal bacteria and probiotic (LJ202 and LR108) or non-probiotic (Lact. mucosae LM303) strains revealed that the growth of SE7106 was completely inhibited either in the presence or in the absence of probiotic strains. Intriguingly, LJ202 exhibited notable inhibitory activity against fecal coliform bacteria while LR108 did not. Taken together, the results of co-culture studies suggested that LJ202 is a good probiotic candidate for further study its inhibitory effects against pathogen infections in pigs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-Salmonella activity; Fecal coliform bacteria; Lact. johnsonii; Lact. reuteri; Pig probiotic

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28712023     DOI: 10.1007/s12602-017-9304-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins        ISSN: 1867-1306            Impact factor:   4.609


  31 in total

1.  Prevention of Escherichia coli infection in broiler chickens with Lactobacillus plantarum B1.

Authors:  S Wang; Q Peng; H M Jia; X F Zeng; J L Zhu; C L Hou; X T Liu; F J Yang; S Y Qiao
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  No beneficial effects evident for Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 in weaned pigs infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104.

Authors:  Susanne Kreuzer; Pawel Janczyk; Jens Assmus; Michael F G Schmidt; Gudrun A Brockmann; Karsten Nöckler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Variability in growth/no growth boundaries of 188 different Escherichia coli strains reveals that approximately 75% have a higher growth probability under low pH conditions than E. coli O157:H7 strain ATCC 43888.

Authors:  L U Haberbeck; R C Oliveira; B Vivijs; T Wenseleers; A Aertsen; C Michiels; A H Geeraerd
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 5.516

4.  Lactate acid inhibition of Salmonella typhimurium in yogurt.

Authors:  H E Rubin; T Nerad; F Vaughan
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Adhesion of human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB to human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells.

Authors:  G Chauvière; M H Coconnier; S Kernéis; J Fourniat; A L Servin
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1992-08

6.  Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture treatment timing on Salmonella Enteritidis in neonatal broilers.

Authors:  J P Higgins; S E Higgins; A D Wolfenden; S N Henderson; A Torres-Rodriguez; J L Vicente; B M Hargis; G Tellez
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Species interactions differ in their genetic robustness.

Authors:  Lon M Chubiz; Brian R Granger; Daniel Segrè; William R Harcombe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Draft Genome Sequence of the Lactobacillus mucosae Strain Marseille.

Authors:  Fatima Drissi; Vicky Merhej; Caroline Blanc-Tailleur; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-07-30

Review 9.  Utilization and control of ecological interactions in polymicrobial infections and community-based microbial cell factories.

Authors:  Vinoth Wigneswaran; Cristina Isabel Amador; Lotte Jelsbak; Claus Sternberg; Lars Jelsbak
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-03-31

10.  Using In Vitro Immunomodulatory Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Selection of Probiotics against Salmonella Infection in Broiler Chicks.

Authors:  Junchang Feng; Lihong Wang; Luoxiong Zhou; Xin Yang; Xin Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and emerging systems biology approaches to discover how the human gut microbiome impact host physiology.

Authors:  Gordon Qian; Joshua W K Ho
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-07-07

2.  Effect of quorum-quenching bacterium Bacillus sp. QSI-1 on protein profiles and extracellular enzymatic activities of Aeromonas hydrophila YJ-1.

Authors:  Shuxin Zhou; Zixun Yu; Weihua Chu
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.605

3.  Influence of Lactobacillus casei WB 315 and crude fish oil (CFO) on growth performance, EPA, DHA, HDL, LDL, cholesterol of meat broiler chickens.

Authors:  Andreas Berny Yulianto; Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari; Rifqi Najwan; Hana Cipka Pramuda Wardhani; Nabil Fariz Noor Rahman; Khoirul Huda; Nuria Ulfah
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2020-04

4.  Characterization and evaluation of anti-Salmonella enteritidis activity of indigenous probiotic lactobacilli in mice.

Authors:  Amina Mustafa; Muhammad Nawaz; Masood Rabbani; Muhammad Tayyab; Madiha Khan
Journal:  Open Life Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 1.311

5.  Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Reduces the Pathogenicity of Escherichia coli in Chickens.

Authors:  Mengjiao Guo; Congyue Zhang; Chengcheng Zhang; Xiaorong Zhang; Yantao Wu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Role of Lactobacillus reuteri in Human Health and Diseases.

Authors:  Qinghui Mu; Vincent J Tavella; Xin M Luo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  In vitro assessment of antibacterial activity from Lactobacillus spp. strains against virulent Salmonella species isolated from slaughter animals in Benin.

Authors:  Alidehou Jerrold Agbankpe; Tamegnon Victorien Dougnon; Roubaya Balarabe; Esther Deguenon; Lamine Baba-Moussa
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-12-13

8.  Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. Strains Inhibit Growth, Adhesion, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression of Bacterial Vaginosis-Inducing Gardnerella vaginalis.

Authors:  Zhixiang Qian; Hui Zhu; Dan Zhao; Ping Yang; Fei Gao; Chunyi Lu; Yu Yin; Shidong Kan; Daijie Chen
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 9.  Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Jumana Abuqwider; Mohammad Altamimi; Gianluigi Mauriello
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.