Literature DB >> 24810676

Muscle as a molecular machine for protecting joints and bones by absorbing mechanical impacts.

Armen Sarvazyan1, Oleg Rudenko2, Salavat Aglyamov3, Stanislav Emelianov4.   

Abstract

We hypothesize that dissipation of mechanical energy of external impact to absorb mechanical shock is a fundamental function of skeletal muscle in addition to its primary function to convert chemical energy into mechanical energy. In physical systems, the common mechanism for absorbing mechanical shock is achieved with the use of both elastic and viscous elements and we hypothesize that the viscosity of the skeletal muscle is a variable parameter which can be voluntarily controlled by changing the tension of the contracting muscle. We further hypothesize that an ability of muscle to absorb shock has been an important factor in biological evolution, allowing the life to move from the ocean to land, from hydrodynamic to aerodynamic environment with dramatically different loading conditions for musculoskeletal system. The ability of muscle to redistribute the energy of mechanical shock in time and space and unload skeletal joints is of key importance in physical activities. We developed a mathematical model explaining the absorption of mechanical shock energy due to the increased viscosity of contracting skeletal muscles. The developed model, based on the classical theory of sliding filaments, demonstrates that the increased muscle viscosity is a result of the time delay (or phase shift) between the mechanical impact and the attachment/detachment of myosin heads to binding sites on the actin filaments. The increase in the contracted muscle's viscosity is time dependent. Since the forward and backward rate constants for binding the myosin heads to the actin filaments are on the order of 100s(-1), the viscosity of the contracted muscle starts to significantly increase with an impact time greater than 0.01s. The impact time is one of the key parameters in generating destructive stress in the colliding objects. In order to successfully dampen a short high power impact, muscles must first slow it down to engage the molecular mechanism of muscle viscosity. Muscle carries out two functions, acting first as a nonlinear spring to slow down impact and second as a viscous damper to absorb the impact. Exploring the ability of muscle to absorb mechanical shock may shed light to many problems of medical biomechanics and sports medicine. Currently there are no clinical devices for real-time quantitative assessment of viscoelastic properties of contracting muscles in vivo. Such assessment may be important for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment of various muscle disorders such as muscle dystrophy, motor neuron diseases, inflammatory and metabolic myopathies and many more.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810676      PMCID: PMC4112738          DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  34 in total

1.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics.

Authors:  A P Sarvazyan; O V Rudenko; S D Swanson; J B Fowlkes; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Muscle contraction: viscous-like frictional forces and the impulsive model.

Authors:  G F Elliott; C R Worthington
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 6.953

3.  Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Gennisson; Thomas Deffieux; Emilie Macé; Gabriel Montaldo; Mathias Fink; Mickaël Tanter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Experimental basis of the hypotheses on the mechanism of skeletal muscle contraction.

Authors:  Enrico Grazi
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-02-15

5.  [The reconstruction of mechanical properties of layered viscoelastic media based on impedance measurements].

Authors:  A R Skovoroda; S R Agliamov
Journal:  Biofizika       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

6.  A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurements of the mechanical properties of soft tissue.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; D R Dougherty; F S Vinson
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1987

7.  Theoretical and experimental behaviour of the muscle viscosity coefficient during maximal concentric actions.

Authors:  A Martin; L Martin; B Morlon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

8.  Equilibrium muscle cross-bridge behavior. Theoretical considerations.

Authors:  M Schoenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Evaluation of healthy and diseased muscle with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Basford; Thomas R Jenkyn; Kai-Nan An; Richard L Ehman; Guido Heers; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  A physical model of ATP-induced actin-myosin movement in vitro.

Authors:  K Tawada; K Sekimoto
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tennis Racket Vibrations and Shock Transmission to the Wrist during Forehand Drive.

Authors:  Isabelle Rogowski; Thomas Creveaux; Sylvain Triquigneaux; Pierre Macé; Fabien Gauthier; Violaine Sevrez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Biomechanical Process of Skeletal Muscle under Training Condition Based on 3D Visualization Technology.

Authors:  Chen Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.