Literature DB >> 17258311

Noninvasive image analysis of 3D construct mineralization in a perfusion bioreactor.

Blaise D Porter1, Angela S P Lin, Alexandra Peister, Dietmar Hutmacher, Robert E Guldberg.   

Abstract

Although the beneficial effects of perfusion on cell-mediated mineralization have been demonstrated in several studies, the size of the mineralized constructs produced has been limited. The ability to quantify mineralized matrix formation non-invasively within 3D constructs would benefit efforts to optimize bioreactor conditions for scaling-up constructs to clinically relevant dimensions. In this study, we report a micro-CT imaging-based technique to monitor 3D mineralization over time in a perfusion bioreactor and specifically assess mechanisms of construct mineralization by quantifying the number, size, and distribution of mineralized particle formation within constructs varying in thickness from 3 to 9 mm. As expected, mineralized matrix volume and particle number increased with construct thickness. Analyzing multiple concentric volumes inside each construct indicated that a greater proportion of the mineral volume was found within the interior of the perfused constructs. Interestingly, intermediate-sized 6mm thick constructs were found to have the highest core mineral volume fraction and the largest mineralized particles. Two complementary mechanisms of increasing total mineral volume were observed in the 6 and 9 mm constructs: increasing particle size and increasing the number of mineralized particles, respectively. The rate of mineralized matrix formation in the perfused constructs increased from 0.69 mm(3)/week during the first 3 weeks of culture to 1.03 mm(3)/week over the final 2 weeks. In contrast, the rate of mineral deposition in the static controls was 0.01 mm(3)/week during the first 3 weeks of culture and 0.16 mm(3)/week from week 3 to week 5. The ability to monitor overall construct mineralization non-invasively coupled with quantitative analysis of mineralized particle size, number, and distribution offers a powerful tool for elucidating how mineral growth mechanisms are affected by cell type, scaffold material and architecture, or bioreactor flow conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258311     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  28 in total

1.  Runx2 overexpression in bone marrow stromal cells accelerates bone formation in critical-sized femoral defects.

Authors:  Abigail M Wojtowicz; Kellie L Templeman; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Amniotic fluid stem cells produce robust mineral deposits on biodegradable scaffolds.

Authors:  Alexandra Peister; Eric R Deutsch; Yash Kolambkar; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  The impact of biomechanics in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  David L Butler; Steven A Goldstein; Robert E Guldberg; X Edward Guo; Roger Kamm; Cato T Laurencin; Larry V McIntire; Van C Mow; Robert M Nerem; Robert L Sah; Louis J Soslowsky; Robert L Spilker; Robert T Tranquillo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  Quantifying the 3D macrostructure of tissue scaffolds.

Authors:  Julian R Jones; Robert C Atwood; Gowsihan Poologasundarampillai; Sheng Yue; Peter D Lee
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Cell culture systems for studies of bone and tooth mineralization.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey; Rani Roy
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Histological Method to Study the Effect of Shear Stress on Cell Proliferation and Tissue Morphology in a Bioreactor.

Authors:  Morgan Chabanon; Hervé Duval; Jérôme Grenier; Claire Beauchesne; Benoit Goyeau; Bertrand David
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  Three-dimensional characterization of tissue-engineered constructs by contrast-enhanced nanofocus computed tomography.

Authors:  Ioannis Papantoniou; Maarten Sonnaert; Liesbet Geris; Frank P Luyten; Jan Schrooten; Greet Kerckhofs
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 8.  Automating the processing steps for obtaining bone tissue-engineered substitutes: from imaging tools to bioreactors.

Authors:  Pedro F Costa; Albino Martins; Nuno M Neves; Manuela E Gomes; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Specimen size and porosity can introduce error into microCT-based tissue mineral density measurements.

Authors:  Roberto J Fajardo; Esther Cory; Nipun D Patel; Ara Nazarian; Andres Laib; Rajaram K Manoharan; James E Schmitz; Jeremy M DeSilva; Laura M MacLatchy; Brian D Snyder; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Biomechanical forces in the skeleton and their relevance to bone metastasis: biology and engineering considerations.

Authors:  Maureen E Lynch; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.