Morgan Chabanon1,2, Hervé Duval3, Jérôme Grenier1,3, Claire Beauchesne1,4, Benoit Goyeau4, Bertrand David1. 1. MSSMat, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris Saclay, CNRS, 3 rue Joliot-Curie, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 2. 2Present Address: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA. 3. LGPM, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris Saclay, 3 rue Joliot-Curie, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 4. EM2C, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris Saclay, CNRS, 3 rue Joliot-Curie, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Abstract
Background: Tissue engineering represents a promising approach for the production of bone substitutes. The use of perfusion bioreactors for the culture of bone-forming cells on a three-dimensional porous scaffold resolves mass transport limitations and provides mechanical stimuli. Despite the recent and important development of bioreactors for tissue engineering, the underlying mechanisms leading to the production of bone substitutes remain poorly understood. Methods: In order to study cell proliferation in a perfusion bioreactor, we propose a simplified experimental set-up using an impermeable scaffold model made of 2 mm diameter glass beads on which mechanosensitive cells, NIH-3T3 fibroblasts are cultured for up to 3 weeks under 10 mL/min culture medium flow. A methodology combining histological procedure, image analysis and analytical calculations allows the description and quantification of cell proliferation and tissue production in relation to the mean wall shear stress within the bioreactor. Results: Results show a massive expansion of the cell phase after 3 weeks in bioreactor compared to static control. A scenario of cell proliferation within the three-dimensional bioreactor porosity over the 3 weeks of culture is proposed pointing out the essential role of the contact points between adjacent beads. Calculations indicate that the mean wall shear stress experienced by the cells changes with culture time, from about 50 mPa at the beginning of the experiment to about 100 mPa after 3 weeks. Conclusion: We anticipate that our results will help the development and calibration of predictive models, which rely on estimates and morphological description of cell proliferation under shear stress.
Background: Tissue engineering represents a promising approach for the production of bone substitutes. The use of perfusion bioreactors for the culture of bone-forming cells on a three-dimensional porous scaffold resolves mass transport limitations and provides mechanical stimuli. Despite the recent and important development of bioreactors for tissue engineering, the underlying mechanisms leading to the production of bone substitutes remain poorly understood. Methods: In order to study cell proliferation in a perfusion bioreactor, we propose a simplified experimental set-up using an impermeable scaffold model made of 2 mm diameter glass beads on which mechanosensitive cells, NIH-3T3 fibroblasts are cultured for up to 3 weeks under 10 mL/min culture medium flow. A methodology combining histological procedure, image analysis and analytical calculations allows the description and quantification of cell proliferation and tissue production in relation to the mean wall shear stress within the bioreactor. Results: Results show a massive expansion of the cell phase after 3 weeks in bioreactor compared to static control. A scenario of cell proliferation within the three-dimensional bioreactor porosity over the 3 weeks of culture is proposed pointing out the essential role of the contact points between adjacent beads. Calculations indicate that the mean wall shear stress experienced by the cells changes with culture time, from about 50 mPa at the beginning of the experiment to about 100 mPa after 3 weeks. Conclusion: We anticipate that our results will help the development and calibration of predictive models, which rely on estimates and morphological description of cell proliferation under shear stress.
Authors: W L Grayson; S Bhumiratana; P H Grace Chao; C T Hung; G Vunjak-Novakovic Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Blaise D Porter; Angela S P Lin; Alexandra Peister; Dietmar Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Gregory N Bancroft; Vassilios I Sikavitsas; Juliette van den Dolder; Tiffany L Sheffield; Catherine G Ambrose; John A Jansen; Antonios G Mikos Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-09-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: U M Liegibel; U Sommer; B Bundschuh; B Schweizer; U Hilscher; A Lieder; P Nawroth; C Kasperk Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: Manuel S Brugger; Kathrin Baumgartner; Sophie C F Mauritz; Stefan C Gerlach; Florian Röder; Christine Schlosser; Regina Fluhrer; Achim Wixforth; Christoph Westerhausen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Claire C Beauchesne; Morgan Chabanon; Benjamin Smaniotto; Benoît Ladoux; Benoît Goyeau; Bertrand David Journal: Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Marion Mathelié-Guinlet; Felipe Viela; Jérôme Dehullu; Sviatlana Filimonava; Jason M Rauceo; Peter N Lipke; Yves F Dufrêne Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2021-01-04