Literature DB >> 17258221

Densitometric, morphometric and mechanical distributions in the human proximal femur.

Ara Nazarian1, John Muller, David Zurakowski, Ralph Müller, Brian D Snyder.   

Abstract

With the prevalent use of DXA-measured BMD to assess pathologic hip fractures and its recently reported lack of reliability to predict fracture or account for efficacy of anti-resorptive therapy, it is reasonable to assess whether variations in the primary and secondary tensile and compressive trabecular microstructure can account for variations in proximal femur strength in comparison to DXA-measured BMD. To that end, microstructural and densitometric measures of trabecular bone specimens, from discrete sites within the proximal femur, were correlated with their mechanical properties. We hypothesize that accounting for regional variations in trabecular microstructure will improve predictions of proximal femur strength and stiffness compared to bone density measured by DXA. Forty-seven samples (seven donors) from seven distinct sites of human proximal femur underwent DXA and muCT imaging and mechanical testing. The results revealed significant variations in BMC, morphometric indices and mechanical properties within the proximal femur. This work has demonstrated that the mechanical performance of each sub-region is highly dependent on the corresponding trabecular microstructure. BMD measured by DXA at standard regions of interest cannot resolve the variations in trabecular density and microstructure that govern the mechanical behavior of the proximal femur. This work suggests that a quantitative Singh index that uses high resolution QCT to monitor the trabecular microstructure at specific sub-regions of the proximal femur may allow better predictions of hip fracture risk in individual patients and an improved assessment of changing bone structure in response to pharmacological interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258221     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional image registration of MR proximal femur images for the analysis of trabecular bone parameters.

Authors:  Janet Blumenfeld; Colin Studholme; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Dana Carpenter; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  In brief: classifications in brief: Mirels' classification: metastatic disease in long bones and impending pathologic fracture.

Authors:  Muhammad Umar Jawad; Sean P Scully
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review.

Authors:  Ramin Oftadeh; Miguel Perez-Viloria; Juan C Villa-Camacho; Ashkan Vaziri; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur--prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA.

Authors:  T Baum; J Carballido-Gamio; M B Huber; D Müller; R Monetti; C Räth; F Eckstein; E M Lochmüller; S Majumdar; E J Rummeny; T M Link; J S Bauer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Radiographic trabecular 2D and 3D parameters of proximal femoral bone cores correlate with each other and with yield stress.

Authors:  D Steines; S-W Liew; C Arnaud; R Vargas-Voracek; A Nazarian; R Müller; B Snyder; P Hess; P Lang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Age- and gender-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructure of cortical and trabecular bone at the human femoral neck.

Authors:  H Chen; X Zhou; S Shoumura; S Emura; Y Bunai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Peak trabecular bone microstructure predicts rate of estrogen-deficiency-induced bone loss in rats.

Authors:  Yihan Li; Wei-Ju Tseng; Chantal M J de Bakker; Hongbo Zhao; Rebecca Chung; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  A comparative study of orthotropic and isotropic bone adaptation in the femur.

Authors:  Diogo M Geraldes; Andrew T M Phillips
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  At the moment of occurrence of a fragility hip fracture, men have higher mechanical properties values in comparison with women.

Authors:  Ana C Vale; Inês P Aleixo; Miguel Lúcio; André Saraiva; Joana Caetano-Lopes; Ana Rodrigues; Pedro M Amaral; Luís G Rosa; Jacinto Monteiro; João E Fonseca; Maria F Vaz; Helena Canhão
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Consideration of multiple load cases is critical in modelling orthotropic bone adaptation in the femur.

Authors:  Diogo M Geraldes; Luca Modenese; Andrew T M Phillips
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.