Literature DB >> 17148211

Differential sex allocation in sand lizards: bright males induce daughter production in a species with heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Mats Olsson1, Erik Wapstra, Tobias Uller.   

Abstract

In sand lizards (Lacerta agilis), males with more and brighter nuptial coloration also have more DNA fragments visualized in restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of their major histocompatibility complex class I loci (and, hence, are probably more heterozygous at these loci). Such males produce more viable offspring, with a particularly strong viability effect on daughters. This suggests that females should adjust both their reproductive investment and offspring sex ratio in relation to male coloration (i.e. differential allocation). Our results show that experimental manipulation of partner coloration in the wild results in significantly higher maternal effort and a 10% higher proportion of daughters than sons. This supports the hypothesis that females increase their maternal energetic expenditure and adjust their offspring sex ratio in response to high-quality partners. However, it also suggests that this has probably evolved through natural selection for increased offspring viability (primarily through production of daughters), rather than through increased mate attraction (e.g. sexy sons).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17148211      PMCID: PMC1617163          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.

Authors:  Kenneth M Fedorka; Timothy A Mousseau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population.

Authors:  H Ellegren; L Gustafsson; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of Haldane's rule in sex allocation.

Authors:  Mats Olsson; Thomas Madsen; Tobias Uller; Erik Wapstra; Beata Ujvari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Promiscuity in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) and adder snakes (Vipera berus): causes and consequences.

Authors:  M Olsson; T Madsen
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Fit and fat from enlarged badges: a field experiment on male sand lizards.

Authors:  Sofia Anderholm; Mats Olsson; Erik Wapstra; Karin Ryberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards.

Authors:  Mats Olsson; Thomas Madsen; Jessica Nordby; Erik Wapstra; Beata Ujvari; Håkan Wittsell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sex ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness.

Authors:  N Burley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Sex-specific fitness returns are too weak to select for non-random patterns of sex allocation in a viviparous snake.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Baron; Thomas Tully; Jean-François Le Galliard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Male phenotypic quality influences offspring sex ratio in a polygynous ungulate.

Authors:  Knut H Røed; Øystein Holand; Atle Mysterud; Aage Tverdal; Jouko Kumpula; Mauri Nieminen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Reproducing lizards modify sex allocation in response to operational sex ratios.

Authors:  Daniel A Warner; Richard Shine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sons are made from old stores: sperm storage effects on sex ratio in a lizard.

Authors:  Mats Olsson; Tonia Schwartz; Tobias Uller; Mo Healey
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.

Authors:  W Edwin Harris; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  When field experiments yield unexpected results: lessons learned from measuring selection in White Sands lizards.

Authors:  Kayla M Hardwick; Luke J Harmon; Scott D Hardwick; Erica Bree Rosenblum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.