Literature DB >> 17254981

Variability of the mechanical properties of bone, and its evolutionary consequences.

John D Currey1, Jonathan W Pitchford, Paul D Baxter.   

Abstract

The relative variabilities (coefficient of variation (CV)) of 10 different mechanical properties of compact bone were determined from 2166 measurements. All measures of variability were made on a minimum of four specimens from any bone. Three pre-yield properties had a CV of about 12%. Six post-yield properties had CVs varying from 24 to 46%. Pre-yield properties increase as a function of mineral content, whereas post-yield properties decrease. These differences give insight into mechanical phenomena occurring at different stages during loading. Furthermore, the fact that some properties are more tightly determined than others has implications for the optimum values set by natural selection. This assertion is made more rigorous using a simple mathematical model for the evolutionarily optimal allocation in a trade-off where one property is imprecisely determined. It is argued that in general the optimum will be biased in favour of the more tightly determined properties than would be the case if all properties had the same CV.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17254981      PMCID: PMC2358968          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  7 in total

1.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue.

Authors:  D T Reilly; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Notch sensitivity of mammalian mineralized tissues in impact.

Authors:  John D Currey; Kevin Brear; Peter Zioupos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolution of mechanoregulation of bone growth will lead to non-optimal bone phenotypes.

Authors:  Niamh C Nowlan; Patrick J Prendergast
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes.

Authors:  U Dieckmann; R Law
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone.

Authors:  J D Currey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Bending and fracture of compact circumferential and osteonal lamellar bone of the baboon tibia.

Authors:  D Liu; H D Wagner; S Weiner
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  What determines the bending strength of compact bone?

Authors:  J D Currey
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Smaller, weaker, and less stiff bones evolve from changes in subsistence strategy.

Authors:  N C Nowlan; K J Jepsen; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Evolutionary optimality in stochastic search problems.

Authors:  Mark D Preston; Jonathan W Pitchford; A Jamie Wood
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Higher doses of bisphosphonates further improve bone mass, architecture, and strength but not the tissue material properties in aged rats.

Authors:  Mohammad Shahnazari; Wei Yao; WeiWei Dai; Bob Wang; Sophi S Ionova-Martin; Robert O Ritchie; Daniel Heeren; Andrew J Burghardt; Daniel P Nicolella; Michael G Kimiecik; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Measurement of the toughness of bone: a tutorial with special reference to small animal studies.

Authors:  R O Ritchie; K J Koester; S Ionova; W Yao; N E Lane; J W Ager
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Limited impacts of thermoneutral housing on bone morphology and mechanical properties in growing female mice exposed to external loading and raloxifene treatment.

Authors:  Carli A Tastad; Rachel Kohler; Joseph M Wallace
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Fishing for nutrients in heterogeneous landscapes: modelling plant growth trade-offs in monocultures and mixed communities.

Authors:  Simon Antony Croft; Jonathan W Pitchford; Angela Hodge
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Association between femur size and a focal defect of the superior femoral neck.

Authors:  A H Gee; G M Treece; C J Tonkin; D M Black; K E S Poole
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Merging cranial histology and 3D-computational biomechanics: a review of the feeding ecology of a Late Triassic temnospondyl amphibian.

Authors:  Dorota Konietzko-Meier; Kamil Gruntmejer; Jordi Marcé-Nogué; Adam Bodzioch; Josep Fortuny
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  More than one way of being a moa: differences in leg bone robustness map divergent evolutionary trajectories in Dinornithidae and Emeidae (Dinornithiformes).

Authors:  Charlotte A Brassey; Richard N Holdaway; Abigail G Packham; Jennifer Anné; Philip L Manning; William I Sellers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone.

Authors:  Luca Lamazza; Girolamo Garreffa; Domenica Laurito; Marco Lollobrigida; Luigi Palmieri; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.