Literature DB >> 15882703

Evolution of mechanoregulation of bone growth will lead to non-optimal bone phenotypes.

Niamh C Nowlan1, Patrick J Prendergast.   

Abstract

Mechanical forces acting on the bones during growth affect their final shape and strength. Mechanoregulation of bone growth may be recognized in embryogenesis, and also in the adaptation of the adult skeleton to changes in mechanical loading. Mechanoregulatory responses for tissues have arisen during evolution, but does evolution give rise to responses that produce optimal skeletal phenotypes? In this paper, we investigate the emergence of an optimal mechanoregulation response in a population. By combining equations describing long bone growth with a genetic algorithm to describe evolutionary change, we created a computational model to simulate the evolution of mechanoregulation in bone growth. A population of individuals is created where each individual is assigned a diploid gene set which controls the growth and remodelling of the bone. At maturity, each bone is assessed and its 'fitness' calculated; fitness is quantified as bone strength relative to bone mass. The simulation continues for many generations, and includes mutations and a varying environment. The genes present in the population are tracked and the evolution of parameters governing mechanoregulation is calculated. The results indicate that a population may converge to one bone growth algorithm but, more usually, a range of mechanoregulation algorithms for different individuals will persist after many generations. Even if the population converges to one mechanoregulation law, convergence to the 'optimum' bone was never found. Although many researchers propose that natural selection has pushed skeletal structure towards an optimum, our computational model suggests that this is unlikely to be the case.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15882703     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

1.  Smaller, weaker, and less stiff bones evolve from changes in subsistence strategy.

Authors:  N C Nowlan; K J Jepsen; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Variability of the mechanical properties of bone, and its evolutionary consequences.

Authors:  John D Currey; Jonathan W Pitchford; Paul D Baxter
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  In silico evolution of functional morphology: A test on bone tissue biomechanics.

Authors:  Emmanuel de Margerie; Paul Tafforeau; Lalaonirina Rakotomanana
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Function, ontogeny and canalization of shape variance in the primate scapula.

Authors:  Nathan M Young
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  "May the force be with you": 14th Samuel Haughton lecture.

Authors:  P J Prendergast
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Evidence for pleiotropic factors in genetics of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  David Karasik; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Osteoporosis: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  David Karasik
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Phenotypic integration of skeletal traits during growth buffers genetic variants affecting the slenderness of femora in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Bin Hu; Steven M Tommasini; Hayden-William Courtland; Christopher Price; Matthew Cordova; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Genetics of the musculoskeletal system: a pleiotropic approach.

Authors:  David Karasik; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.741

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.