Literature DB >> 17254862

Clinical and angiographic outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with Matrix detachable coils in Chinese patients.

George K C Wong1, Simon C H Yu, W S Poon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aneurysm recurrence is an innate problem in endovascular treatment of aneurysms with coils. A coated coil system named Matrix (Boston Scientific Neurovascular, Fremont, CA), covered with a bioabsorbable polymeric material (polyglycolide/lactide copolymer [PGLA]), was developed to accelerate intraaneurysmal clot organization and fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Matrix detachable coils in patients with intracranial aneurysms and aneurysmal recurrence rate.
METHODS: In a regional neurosurgical center in Hong Kong, data of patients undergoing endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysm was collected. In a 20-month period, 42 patients with 44 aneurysms were treated by endovascular embolization using matrix coils alone or mixed with bare platinum coils. Thirty-four patients presented with ruptured aneurysms, and 8 patients presented with unruptured aneurysms.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (60%) had 6-month follow-up DSA, and 10 patients (24%) had 18-month follow-up DSA. Seven aneurysm recurrences were identified, amounting to 16% for all aneurysms and 14% for ruptured aneurysms. Four patients were treated by repeated embolization, and 2 patients were treated by microsurgical clipping. Two adverse events due to thromboembolism were noted. One 78-year-old lady with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage treated by partial embolization died from rebleed at day 4. Another patient with partial embolization and spontaneous thrombosis of dorsal wall ICA aneurysm died at 2 months with aneurysm recanalization with rerupture. Twenty-six patients achieved favorable outcome (GOS score 4 or 5) at last follow-up. The aneurysm recurrence rate using bare platinum coils of the same center was 11% and 7% for all aneurysms and ruptured aneurysms, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Matrix coil embolization was safe, but there was no reduction in aneurysm recurrence using matrix coils alone or mixed with GDCs, compared with GDCs alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17254862     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.05.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  6 in total

1.  A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  T J Kaufmann; J Huston; H J Cloft; J Mandrekar; L Gray; M A Bernstein; J L Atkinson; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Matrix reloaded.

Authors:  H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Materials and techniques for coiling of cerebral aneurysms: how much scientific evidence do we have?

Authors:  W Kurre; J Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Angiographic results in intracranial aneurysms treated with inert platinum coils.

Authors:  J R Vanzin; C Mounayer; D G Abud; R D'agostini Annes; J Moret
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Single-institution experience with matrix coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with same-center outcomes with the use of platinum coils.

Authors:  D J Rivet; C J Moran; A Mazumdar; T K Pilgram; C P Derdeyn; D T Cross
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Long-term results with Matrix coils vs. GDC: an angiographic and histopathological comparison.

Authors:  C Roth; T Struffert; I Q Grunwald; B F M Romeike; C Krick; P Papanagiotou; P Krampe; W Reith
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.804

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.