Literature DB >> 17254833

Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?

Martin J Pickering1, Simon Garrod.   

Abstract

We present the case that language comprehension involves making simultaneous predictions at different linguistic levels and that these predictions are generated by the language production system. Recent research suggests that ease of comprehending predictable elements is due to prediction rather than facilitated integration, and that comprehension is accompanied by covert imitation. We argue that comprehenders use prediction and imitation to construct an "emulator", using the production system, and combine predictions with the input dynamically. Such a process helps to explain the rapidity of comprehension and the robust interpretation of ambiguous or noisy input. This framework is in line with a general trend in cognitive science to incorporate action systems into perceptual systems and has broad implications for understanding the links between language production and comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17254833     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  114 in total

1.  Neural correlates of the perception of contrastive prosodic focus in French: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti; Marion Dohen; Hélène Lœvenbruck; Marc Sato; Cédric Pichat; Monica Baciu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication.

Authors:  Greg J Stephens; Lauren J Silbert; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Animacy and competition in relative clause production: a cross-linguistic investigation.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Givenness, complexity, and the Danish dative alternation.

Authors:  Johannes Kizach; Laura Winther Balling
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

Review 6.  Structural priming: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Cross-modal prediction in speech depends on prior linguistic experience.

Authors:  Carolina Sánchez-García; James T Enns; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The role of linguistic experience in the processing of probabilistic information in production.

Authors:  Erin Gustafson; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Sensory-motor brain network connectivity for speech comprehension.

Authors:  Alessandro Londei; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Demis Basso; Carlo Sestieri; Cosimo Del Gratta; Gian-Luca Romani; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.