Literature DB >> 17251360

Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

M A Nitsche1, S Doemkes, T Karaköse, A Antal, D Liebetanz, N Lang, F Tergau, W Paulus.   

Abstract

Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) induces stimulation polarity-dependent neuroplastic excitability shifts in the human brain. Because it accomplishes long-lasting effects and its application is simple, it is used increasingly. However, one drawback is its low focality, caused by 1) the large stimulation electrode and 2) the functionally effective reference electrode, which is also situated on the scalp. We aimed to increase the focality of tDCS, which might improve the interpretation of the functional effects of stimulation because it will restrict its effects to more clearly defined cortical areas. Moreover, it will avoid unwanted reversed effects of tDCS under the reference electrode, which is of special importance in clinical settings, when a homogeneous shift of cortical excitability is needed. Because current density (current strength/electrode size) determines the efficacy of tDCS, increased focality should be accomplished by 1) reducing stimulation electrode size, but keeping current density constant; or 2) increasing reference electrode size under constant current strength. We tested these hypotheses for motor cortex tDCS. The results show that reducing the size of the motor cortex DC-stimulation electrode focalized the respective tDCS-induced excitability changes. Increasing the size of the frontopolar reference electrode rendered stimulation over this cortex functionally inefficient, but did not compromise the tDCS-generated motor cortical excitability shifts. Thus tDCS-generated modulations of cortical excitability can be focused by reducing the size of the stimulation electrode and by increasing the size of the reference electrode. For future applications of tDCS, such paradigms may help to achieve more selective tDCS effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251360     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01312.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  244 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effect of tDCS with an extracephalic reference electrode on cardio-respiratory and autonomic functions.

Authors:  Yves Vandermeeren; Jacques Jamart; Michel Ossemann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry.

Authors:  Antje Kraft; Jasper Roehmel; Manuel C Olma; Sein Schmidt; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Kenneth A Weber; James W Stinear
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Brain stimulation improves cognitive control by modulating medial-frontal activity and preSMA-vmPFC functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jiaxin Yu; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Shih-Wei Wu; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.